Ning Su

540 citations
22 papers · 140 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Ning Su

19 papers receiving 139 citations

Peers

Ning Su
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 27
  • Family Practice 3
  • Physiology 30
  • Rheumatology 17
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 13
Replace Won-Suk Sung with:
Won-Suk Sung South Korea
Anni Joensuu Finland
Liliana G Ciobanu Australia
A.R.V.R. Horimoto Brazil
Shun Yao China
Bradley Jermy United Kingdom
Éimear M. Foley United Kingdom
Friederike Denzer Germany
Wenqi Geng China
Darioush Yarand United Kingdom
Ning Su relative to Won-Suk Sung South Korea Won-Suk Sung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Won-Suk Sung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ning Su

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ning Su's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ning Su with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ning Su more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ning Su

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ning Su. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ning Su. The network helps show where Ning Su may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ning Su, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ning Su Line = papers co-authored together Ning Su links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202127
2 201126
3 202314
4 202310
5 202210
6 20179
7 20248
8 20206
9 20245
10 20244
11 20234
12 20243
13 20193
14 20223
15 20233
16 20242
17
Pulse in Diagnosis and Treatment of Guiding Significance for Stroke
20101
18 20191
19 20211
20 20230

About Ning Su

Ning Su is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 140 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physical Activity and Health (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (27 citations), Family Practice (3 citations), Physiology (30 citations), Rheumatology (17 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (13 citations). Ning Su has collaborated with scholars based in China, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shifu Xiao, Lin Sun, Xia Li, Wei Li, Wei Liang, Yanping Duan, Wei Dong, Zhijun Cheng, Huqu Zhai and Ryan E. Rhodes. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Public Health, Scientific Reports, Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, General Psychiatry and Applied Psychology Health and Well-Being.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact