Nina Smyth
Impact in
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Stress Responses and Cortisol 22
- Co-authors
- Angela ClowPhil EvansSonia LupienStefan WüstClemens KirschbaumTobias StalderEmma K. AdamMark Wetherell
- Journals
- Psychoneuroendocrinology (16 papers)International review of neurobiology (2 papers)International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2 papers)Stress (2 papers)Anxiety Stress & Coping (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nina Smyth
46 papers receiving 1.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Behavioral Neuroscience 837
- Biological Psychiatry 159
- Clinical Psychology 544
- Applied Psychology 124
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 257
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Smyth
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Smyth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Smyth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Smyth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Smyth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Smyth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Smyth. The network helps show where Nina Smyth may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina Smyth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 19 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 56 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 12 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 17 | Assessment of the cortisol awakening response: Expert consensus guidelines Hit paper breakdown → | 2015 | 761 |
| 18 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2012 | 62 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 28 |
About Nina Smyth
Nina Smyth is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Applied Psychology, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitation, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (22 papers), Urban Green Space and Health (6 papers), Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control (5 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (5 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (5 papers), Long-Term Effects of COVID-19 (4 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers) and Exercise and Physiological Responses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (837 citations), Biological Psychiatry (159 citations), Clinical Psychology (544 citations), Applied Psychology (124 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (257 citations). Nina Smyth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Angela Clow, Phil Evans, Sonia Lupien, Stefan Wüst, Clemens Kirschbaum, Tobias Stalder, Emma K. Adam, Mark Wetherell, Jens C. Pruessner and Samantha Dockray. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoneuroendocrinology, International review of neurobiology, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Stress and Anxiety Stress & Coping.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.