International review of neurobiology

1.9k papers and 66.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in International review of neurobiology in the last decades have received a total of 66.2k indexed citations. Papers published in International review of neurobiology usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (804 papers), Molecular Biology (554 papers) and Neurology (389 papers) specifically the topics of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (355 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (224 papers) and Neurological disorders and treatments (209 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International review of neurobiology are A. R. Lieberman, Thomas V. Dunwiddie, Jeremy D. Schmahmann, Daniel C. Javitt, Brian S. Meldrum, Arne Schousboe, C.H. Vanderwolf, Deepak Ν. Pandya, Rafael Elul and Margaret R. Byers.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in International review of neurobiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International review of neurobiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International review of neurobiology.

Countries where authors publish in International review of neurobiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International review of neurobiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International review of neurobiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International review of neurobiology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025