Nina Kahma
- Sociology and Political Science
- Food Science
- Marketing top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Co-authors
- Kaisa MatschossMari NivaJohanna MäkeläUnni KjærnesArho ToikkaSatu HelakorpiPiia JallinojaEva Heiskanen
- Topics
- Research in Social Sciences (5 papers)Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers)Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Nina Kahma
20 papers receiving 287 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Sociology and Political Science 103
- Food Science 53
- Marketing 43
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 42
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 41
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Kahma
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Kahma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Kahma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Kahma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Kahma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Kahma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Kahma. The network helps show where Nina Kahma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Kahma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Kahma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Kahma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Kahma. Nina Kahma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | Open e-learning platforms and the design-reality gap: exploring the impact of user-perceived functional affordances | 1 |
| 4 | 66 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | The food we eat in Nordic countries – some changes between 1997 and 2012 | 8 |
| 10 | Service interest and cluster membership - Who are the pioneering users in energy efficiency service markets? | 3 |
| 11 | 22 | |
| 12 | Suomalainen maku: Kulttuuripääoma, kulutus ja elämäntyylien sosiaalinen eriytyminen | 6 |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | Yhteiskuntaluokka ja maku | 4 |
| 17 | Keskiluokan valossa : suomalaisten luokkasamastuminen empiirisessä tarkastelussa | 4 |
| 18 | 32 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Nina Kahma
Nina Kahma is a scholar working on Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management, Marketing and Computer Science Applications, having authored 21 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Research in Social Sciences (5 papers), Social and Cultural Dynamics (4 papers) and Organic Food and Agriculture (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (10 citations), Marketing (43 citations) and Urban Studies (19 citations). Nina Kahma has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Ireland and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include Kaisa Matschoss, Mari Niva, Johanna Mäkelä, Unni Kjærnes, Arho Toikka, Satu Helakorpi, Piia Jallinoja, Eva Heiskanen, Stephen McCarthy and Laura Lynch. Their work appears in journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Appetite and Journal of the Association for Information Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.