Nina Horstmann
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Co-authors
- Andreas GlöcknerAndrea FischbachPhilipp Wolfgang LichtenthalerSanai LiV. SengEun‐Jeong LeeQingguo WangJong Ahn Chun
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper)
- Journals
- Bulletin of the American Meteorological SocietyAgricultural SystemsJudgment and Decision Making
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited StatesSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Nina Horstmann
7 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- General Decision Sciences 100
- Cognitive Neuroscience 70
- Economics and Econometrics 52
- Sociology and Political Science 50
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 38
Countries citing papers authored by Nina Horstmann
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Horstmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Horstmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Horstmann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Horstmann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Horstmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Horstmann. The network helps show where Nina Horstmann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Horstmann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Horstmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Horstmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Horstmann. Nina Horstmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 41 | |
| 3 | 60 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | How distinct are intuition and deliberation? An eye-tracking analysis of instruction-induced decision modes | 89 |
| 6 | 84 | |
| 7 | 63 |
About Nina Horstmann
Nina Horstmann is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Gender Studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (2 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (100 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations) and Safety Research (34 citations). Nina Horstmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Glöckner, Andrea Fischbach, Philipp Wolfgang Lichtenthaler, Sanai Li, V. Seng, Eun‐Jeong Lee, Qingguo Wang, Jong Ahn Chun, Bin Wang and Wenju Cai. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, Agricultural Systems and Judgment and Decision Making.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.