This map shows the geographic impact of Nigel Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nigel Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nigel Ford more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nigel Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nigel Ford. The network helps show where Nigel Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nigel Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nigel Ford.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nigel Ford based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nigel Ford. Nigel Ford is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Rutter, Sophie, Nigel Ford, & Paul Clough. (2015). How Do Children Reformulate Their Search Queries. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 20(1).11 indexed citations
4.
Carter, Jenny, et al.. (2009). An analysis of interviews with composers from a cognitive styles perspective.. DMU Open Research Archive (De Montfort University). 2009. 391–394.1 indexed citations
Madden, Andrew, Barry Eaglestone, Nigel Ford, & Martin Whittle. (2007). Search engines: a first step to finding information: preliminary findings from a study of observed searches. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.7 indexed citations
7.
Whittle, Martin, Barry Eaglestone, Nigel Ford, Valerie J. Gillet, & Andrew Madden. (2006). Query transformations and their role in Web searching by the general public. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 12(1). 5.2 indexed citations
8.
Eaglestone, Barry, et al.. (2005). THE COMPOSITIONAL PROCESSES OF ELECTROACOUSTIC COMPOSERS: CONTRASTING PERSPECTIVES. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 2005.4 indexed citations
9.
Eaglestone, Barry, et al.. (2002). A qualitative analysis of composers at work.. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 2002.8 indexed citations
10.
Eaglestone, Barry, et al.. (2001). Do Composition Systems Support Creativity? - An evaluation. The Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association. 2001.1 indexed citations
11.
Wilson, T. D., Nigel Ford, Allen Foster, & Amanda Spink. (2000). Uncertainty and its correlates. 1. 69–84.23 indexed citations
12.
Ford, Nigel, T. D. Wilson, David Ellis, Allen Foster, & Amanda Spink. (2000). Individual Differences in Information Seeking: An Empirical Study.. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting. 37. 14–24.3 indexed citations
13.
Wilson, T. D., David Ellis, Nigel Ford, & Allen Foster. (2000). Uncertainty in Information Seeking.. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique). 5.8 indexed citations
14.
Ford, Nigel & Sherry Y. Chen. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. 9(4). 281–311.191 indexed citations
Ford, Nigel, et al.. (1997). Towards Adaptive Information Systems: Individual Differences and Hypermedia. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.12 indexed citations
Ford, Nigel, et al.. (1993). Software selection for Indian libraries. 30(4). 146–151.2 indexed citations
19.
Ford, Nigel. (1991). Expert systems and artificial intelligence. an information manager's guide. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.