Nicole Denier
About
In The Last Decade
Nicole Denier
23 papers receiving 399 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Sociology and Political Science 214
- Social Psychology 135
- Gender Studies 110
- General Health Professions 106
- Demography 93
Countries citing papers authored by Nicole Denier
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicole Denier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicole Denier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicole Denier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicole Denier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicole Denier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicole Denier. The network helps show where Nicole Denier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicole Denier
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicole Denier. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicole Denier based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicole Denier. Nicole Denier is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 47 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 26 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 63 | |
| 20 | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.