Nick Knight

481 citations
32 papers · 145 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Knight

26 papers receiving 97 citations

Peers

Nick Knight
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 82
  • Political Science and International Relations 42
  • Cultural Studies 11
  • Development 4
  • Philosophy 10
Replace Arthur Goldschmidt with:
Arthur Goldschmidt United States
Michael A. Ledeen United States
Ruth Bordin United States
Ralf Konersmann Germany
Anne M. Boylan United States
Ato Sekyi-Otu
Van Gosse United States
Ruth Mandel United Kingdom
Larry Wolff United States
Ernesto Ché Guevara El Salvador
Nick Knight relative to Arthur Goldschmidt United States Arthur Goldschmidt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Arthur Goldschmidt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Knight

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Knight's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Knight with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Knight more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Knight

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Knight. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Knight. The network helps show where Nick Knight may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nick Knight, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Knight Line = papers co-authored together Nick Knight links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 198632
2 200518
3
China's great proletarian cultural revolution : master narratives and post-Mao counternarratives
200212
4 200312
5 200611
6 19807
7
Imagining globalisation in China : debates on ideology, politics and culture
20085
8 19864
9 19974
10 19904
11 19834
12 20113
13 20053
14 20043
15 19903
16 19853
17 20202
18 19932
19 19992
20 19982

About Nick Knight

Nick Knight is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Cultural Studies, Information Systems and Management and Public Administration, having authored 32 papers that have together received 145 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (17 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (6 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Globalization and Cultural Identity (2 papers), Political Economy and Marxism (2 papers), Australian History and Society (2 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (2 papers) and Asian Industrial and Economic Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sociology and Political Science (82 citations), Political Science and International Relations (42 citations), Cultural Studies (11 citations), Development (4 citations) and Philosophy (10 citations). Nick Knight has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Ortrun Zuber‐Skerritt, Michael Heazle, Colin Mackerras, Stewart C. Morrison, Lowell Dittmer, Ben Langley and Anne‐Marie Brady. Their work appears in journals such as China Information, Journal of Contemporary Asia, Asian Studies Review, Journal of Applied Biomechanics and Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact