Journal of Applied Biomechanics

1.6k papers and 33.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics in the last decades have received a total of 33.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics usually cover Biomedical Engineering (966 papers), Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (902 papers) and Surgery (385 papers) specifically the topics of Sports injuries and prevention (501 papers), Sports Performance and Training (490 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (461 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Applied Biomechanics are Carlo J. De Luca, Joseph Hamill, Kurt Manal, John H. Challis, Paavo V. Komi, Glenn S. Fleisig, James R. Andrews, Thomas S. Buchanan, Richard E.A. van Emmerik and Bryan C. Heiderscheit.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Applied Biomechanics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Applied Biomechanics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Applied Biomechanics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025