Lowell Dittmer
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- Development top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Co-authors
- Samuel S. KimYu‐Shan WuXiaobo LüLucian W. PyeDonald S. ZagoriaEdward FriedmanGuoli LiuSuzanne Ogden
- Topics
- Chinese history and philosophy (39 papers)China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (26 papers)Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysiaTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Lowell Dittmer
96 papers receiving 749 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Political Science and International Relations 640
- Sociology and Political Science 621
- Development 91
- Economics and Econometrics 65
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 48
Countries citing papers authored by Lowell Dittmer
This map shows the geographic impact of Lowell Dittmer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lowell Dittmer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lowell Dittmer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lowell Dittmer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lowell Dittmer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lowell Dittmer. The network helps show where Lowell Dittmer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lowell Dittmer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lowell Dittmer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lowell Dittmer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lowell Dittmer. Lowell Dittmer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Analysis in limbo? Contemporary chinese politics amid the maturation of Reform | 5 |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | Approaches to the Study of Chinese Politics | 0 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 83 | |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Lowell Dittmer
Lowell Dittmer is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Development, having authored 115 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (39 papers), China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance (26 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (640 citations), Development (91 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (621 citations). Lowell Dittmer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Samuel S. Kim, Yu‐Shan Wu, Xiaobo Lü, Lucian W. Pye, Donald S. Zagoria, Edward Friedman, Guoli Liu, Suzanne Ogden, D. W. Y. Kwok and Gilbert Rozman. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, Foreign Affairs and The American Historical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.