Asian Studies Review

1.3k papers and 7.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Asian Studies Review in the last decades have received a total of 7.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian Studies Review usually cover Sociology and Political Science (799 papers), Political Science and International Relations (458 papers) and Cultural Studies (225 papers) specifically the topics of Asian Studies and History (240 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (162 papers) and Japanese History and Culture (157 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian Studies Review are Michael Barr, Ien Ang, J. A. C. Mackie, Terence Lee, Ross Tapsell, Lily Kong, Brenda S. A. Yeoh, Karl Gustafsson, Lyn Parker and Yijia Jing.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian Studies Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian Studies Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian Studies Review.

Countries where authors publish in Asian Studies Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian Studies Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian Studies Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian Studies Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025