Nick Allcock

1.6k citations
32 papers · 1.2k indexed · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Nick Allcock

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nick Allcock
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Research and Theory 67
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 234
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 33
  • Occupational Therapy 78
  • General Health Professions 413
Replace Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani with:
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan
Carol P. Vojir United States
Gunilla Borglin Sweden
Elizabeth Rideout Canada
Herdís Sveinsdóttir Iceland
Huda Abu‐Saad Netherlands
S Bond United Kingdom
Valerio Dimonte Italy
Ada Jacox United States
Rachel Walker Australia
Nick Allcock relative to Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani Japan Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Noriko Yamamoto‐Mitani · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nick Allcock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nick Allcock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nick Allcock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nick Allcock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nick Allcock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nick Allcock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nick Allcock. The network helps show where Nick Allcock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nick Allcock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nick Allcock Line = papers co-authored together Nick Allcock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201834
2 201657
3 201553
4 2014243
5 20131
6
Competency in managing care in epidural analgesia.
20131
7 2013112
8 201324
9 201129
10
Pain in older people: reflections and experiences from an older person’s perspective
200822
11 200729
12 20038
13 200273
14 200131
15 200117
16 19997
17 199611
18 199631
19 199686
20 199442

About Nick Allcock

Nick Allcock is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Opioid Use (11 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (9 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (4 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (4 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (3 papers) and Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (67 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (234 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (33 citations), Occupational Therapy (78 citations) and General Health Professions (413 citations). Nick Allcock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Malaysia. Frequent co-authors include Michelle Briggs, Eloise Carr, Karen Barker, Francine Toyé, Kate Seers, Heather Wharrad, Judith Lathlean, Ruth Elkan, Anne Marie Rafferty and Julie McGarry. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education Today, International Journal of Nursing Studies, BMC Medical Research Methodology and Disability and Rehabilitation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026