BMC Medical Research Methodology

3.3k papers and 184.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.3k papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology in the last decades have received a total of 184.4k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology usually cover Statistics and Probability (1.0k papers), Economics and Econometrics (769 papers) and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (734 papers) specifically the topics of Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (659 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (630 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (516 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Medical Research Methodology are James Thomas, Angela Harden, Benjamin Djulbegović, Iztok Hozo, Xiang Wan, Wenqian Wang, Tiejun Tong, Jiming Liu, Aluísio J. D. Barros and Vânia Naomi Hirakata.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Medical Research Methodology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Medical Research Methodology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Medical Research Methodology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Medical Research Methodology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025