Nicholas Smith
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Education top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert C. PiantaRonald E. ReeveJean‐Philippe DerantyShane O’NeillEmmanuel RenaultArto LaitinenMartin MonkRobert Sinnerbrink
- Topics
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers)Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers)Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaTheory Culture & SocietyThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nicholas Smith
38 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Sociology and Political Science 151
- Philosophy 86
- Education 82
- Clinical Psychology 73
- Political Science and International Relations 62
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas Smith. The network helps show where Nicholas Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas Smith. Nicholas Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | National benchmark for green infrastructure: A feasibility study | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | New philosophies of labour : work and the social bond | 20 |
| 8 | The Temporality of Sexual Life in Husserl and Freud | 0 |
| 9 | 31 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Perspectives on the philosophy of Charles Taylor | 10 |
| 13 | Stories of Great National Songs | 0 |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Nicholas Smith
Nicholas Smith is a scholar working on Philosophy, Architecture and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (5 papers), Critical Theory and Philosophy (4 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (86 citations), Public Administration (16 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (151 citations). Nicholas Smith has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Pianta, Ronald E. Reeve, Jean‐Philippe Deranty, Shane O’Neill, Emmanuel Renault, Arto Laitinen, Martin Monk, Robert Sinnerbrink, Hans Ruin and Katie Williams. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Theory Culture & Society and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.