James Fieser
- Philosophy top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 10%
- Education
- Topics
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers)Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Fieser
28 papers receiving 244 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Philosophy 84
- Sociology and Political Science 77
- Political Science and International Relations 48
- Information Systems and Management 45
- Education 44
Countries citing papers authored by James Fieser
This map shows the geographic impact of James Fieser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Fieser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Fieser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Fieser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Fieser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Fieser. The network helps show where James Fieser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Fieser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Fieser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Fieser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Fieser. James Fieser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A Voyage to the Moon: With Some Account of the Manners and Customs, Science and Philosophy, of the People of Morosofia, and Other Lunarians | 0 |
| 2 | Early responses to Hume's life and reputation | 7 |
| 3 | Early responses to Hume's History of England | 2 |
| 4 | A Historical Introduction to Philosophy: Texts and Interactive Guides | 1 |
| 5 | Early responses to Hume's writings on religion | 4 |
| 6 | Philosophical and literary essays | 2 |
| 7 | An appeal to common sense in behalf of religion (1766-1772) | 4 |
| 8 | Early responses to Hume's metaphysical and epistemological writings | 6 |
| 9 | Scottish Common Sense Philosophy: Sources and Origins | 3 |
| 10 | A bibliography of Scottish common sense philosophy | 2 |
| 11 | Hume's essays, moral, political, and literary | 1 |
| 12 | Early responses to Hume | 4 |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About James Fieser
James Fieser is a scholar working on Philosophy, General Psychology and General Social Sciences, having authored 34 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (84 citations), Information Systems and Management (45 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). James Fieser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Louis P. Pojman, Samuel Enoch Stumpf, John Powers and Dan Arnold. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Ethics, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Environmental Ethics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.