Julián Baggini
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Education
- Co-authors
- Mary WarnockKate SoperTed Honderich
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers)Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetPhilosophyInquiry
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Julián Baggini
43 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 119
- Philosophy 72
- Social Psychology 47
- Political Science and International Relations 41
- Education 31
Countries citing papers authored by Julián Baggini
This map shows the geographic impact of Julián Baggini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julián Baggini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julián Baggini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julián Baggini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julián Baggini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julián Baggini. The network helps show where Julián Baggini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julián Baggini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julián Baggini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julián Baggini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julián Baggini. Julián Baggini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 47 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | The Edge of Reason: A Rational Skeptic in an Irrational World | 3 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | The pig that wants to be eaten : and ninety-nine other thought experiments | 7 |
| 7 | Should You Judge This Book by Its Cover?: 100 Fresh Takes on Familiar Sayings and Quotations | 1 |
| 8 | The Duck That Won the Lottery: 100 New Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher | 1 |
| 9 | The Duck That Won the Lottery: and 99 Other Bad Arguments | 0 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | The Pig That Wants to Be Eaten: 100 Experiments for the Armchair Philosopher | 3 |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 30 | |
| 17 | What Philosophers Think | 6 |
| 18 | New British Philosophy | 0 |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Julián Baggini
Julián Baggini is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Communication, having authored 53 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (2 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (2 papers) and Populism, Right-Wing Movements (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (72 citations), Gender Studies (29 citations) and Religious studies (15 citations). Julián Baggini has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mary Warnock, Kate Soper and Ted Honderich. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Philosophy and Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.