Nicholas S. Duesbery
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Genetics top 2%
- Biotechnology top 1%
- Immunology top 10%
- Infectious Diseases top 10%
- Co-authors
- George F. Vande WoudeStephen H. LepplaCraig P. WebbV M GordonKurt R. KlimpelK PaullMarianne OskarssonNatalie G. Ahn
- Topics
- Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (28 papers)Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers)Microbial Inactivation Methods (9 papers)
- Cited by
- BiotechnologyVirologyGenetics
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaChina
In The Last Decade
Nicholas S. Duesbery
48 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Molecular Biology 1.9k
- Genetics 820
- Biotechnology 489
- Immunology 232
- Infectious Diseases 228
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas S. Duesbery
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas S. Duesbery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas S. Duesbery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas S. Duesbery more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas S. Duesbery
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas S. Duesbery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas S. Duesbery. The network helps show where Nicholas S. Duesbery may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas S. Duesbery
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas S. Duesbery. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas S. Duesbery based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas S. Duesbery. Nicholas S. Duesbery is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 26 | |
| 4 | Differences in Intraocular Levels of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Diffuse vs. Focal Diabetic Macular Edema | 1 |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 179 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 61 | |
| 17 | 121 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Nicholas S. Duesbery
Nicholas S. Duesbery is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Virology and Genetics, having authored 48 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacillus and Francisella bacterial research (28 papers), Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (12 papers) and Microbial Inactivation Methods (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (489 citations), Virology (176 citations) and Genetics (820 citations). Nicholas S. Duesbery has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and China. Frequent co-authors include George F. Vande Woude, Stephen H. Leppla, Craig P. Webb, V M Gordon, Kurt R. Klimpel, K Paull, Marianne Oskarsson, Natalie G. Ahn, Kenji Fukasawa and Terry D. Copeland. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.