Nicholas M. Law
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Instrumentation top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Computational Mechanics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christoph BaranecReed RiddleS. R. KulkarniCarl ZieglerAdrienne L. ErickcekMarcel A. AgüerosKevin R. CoveyC. D. Mackay
- Topics
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (61 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers)Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (26 papers)
- Journals
- The Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietyThe Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nicholas M. Law
69 papers receiving 975 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 963
- Instrumentation 400
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 136
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 106
- Computational Mechanics 68
Countries citing papers authored by Nicholas M. Law
This map shows the geographic impact of Nicholas M. Law's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicholas M. Law with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicholas M. Law more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nicholas M. Law
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicholas M. Law. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicholas M. Law. The network helps show where Nicholas M. Law may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicholas M. Law
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicholas M. Law. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicholas M. Law based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicholas M. Law. Nicholas M. Law is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | ELEVEN MULTIPLANET SYSTEMS FROM K2 CAMPAIGNS 1 AND 2 AND THE MASSES OF TWO HOT SUPER-EARTHS | 23 |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 54 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | PTF10acbp: A Luminous Red Nova in the Spiral UGC11973 | 1 |
About Nicholas M. Law
Nicholas M. Law is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 85 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (61 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (43 papers) and Adaptive optics and wavefront sensing (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (400 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (963 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (106 citations). Nicholas M. Law has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Baranec, Reed Riddle, S. R. Kulkarni, Carl Ziegler, Adrienne L. Erickcek, Marcel A. Agüeros, Kevin R. Covey, C. D. Mackay, Adam L. Kraus and R. Quimby. Their work appears in journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.