Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The 2001 US Naval Observatory Double Star CD-ROM. I. The Washington Double Star Catalog
2001576 citationsBrian D. Mason, G. L. Wycoff et al.The Astronomical Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Brian D. Mason
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian D. Mason's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian D. Mason with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian D. Mason more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian D. Mason. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian D. Mason. The network helps show where Brian D. Mason may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian D. Mason
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian D. Mason.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian D. Mason based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Brian D. Mason. Brian D. Mason is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mason, Brian D., Andreï Tokovinin, R. A. Méndez, & E. Costa. (2023). Speckle Interferometry at SOAR in 2022. The Astronomical Journal. 166(4). 139–139.3 indexed citations
Farrington, C., Theo A. ten Brummelaar, Brian D. Mason, et al.. (2010). Separated Fringe Packet Observations with the CHARA Array. AAS. 215.2 indexed citations
8.
Mason, Brian D., G. L. Wycoff, William I. Hartkopf, G. G. Douglass, & Charles E. Worley. (2009). VizieR Online Data Catalog: The Washington Visual Double Star Catalog (Mason+ 2001-2010).3 indexed citations
9.
Mason, Brian D., William I. Hartkopf, Todd J. Henry, et al.. (2008). Nearby Dwarf Stars: Duplicity, Binarity, and Masses. 44.1 indexed citations
10.
Mason, Brian D., William I. Hartkopf, & T. E. Corbin. (2005). Obituary: Geoffrey Gardner Douglass, 1942-2005. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 37(4). 1548–1549.1 indexed citations
11.
Hartkopf, William I. & Brian D. Mason. (2004). Addressing confusion in double star nomenclature: the Washington\n\nmultiplicity catalog. Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México).1 indexed citations
12.
Fabricius, C., E. Høg, В. В. Макаров, et al.. (2002). The Tycho double star catalogue. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 384(1). 180–189.138 indexed citations
Mason, Brian D., G. H. Kaplan, G. G. Douglass, D. Pascu, & K. Aksnes. (1999). Close Pairings of Galilean Satellites Observed Using Speckle Interferometry.1 indexed citations
17.
Mason, Brian D., et al.. (1999). Binary Star Orbits from Speckle Interferometry. ASPC. 110. 41.5 indexed citations
18.
Mason, Brian D., G. G. Douglass, & Charles E. Worley. (1998). Speckle Interferometry at the US Naval Observatory. Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society. 191.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.