G. M. Seabroke

39.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

G. M. Seabroke is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, G. M. Seabroke has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25 papers in Instrumentation and 7 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in G. M. Seabroke's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (38 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (24 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers). G. M. Seabroke is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (38 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (24 papers) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (24 papers). G. M. Seabroke collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and France. G. M. Seabroke's co-authors include G. Gilmore, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, Julio F. Navarro, A. Helmi, T. Zwitter, Q. A. Parker, B. K. Gibson, D. Katz, T. Antoja and M. Romero-Gómez and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

In The Last Decade

G. M. Seabroke

44 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. M. Seabroke United Kingdom 23 1.4k 685 106 62 53 45 1.5k
L. Chemin France 25 1.7k 1.2× 831 1.2× 151 1.4× 48 0.8× 36 0.7× 53 1.8k
Bun’ei Sato Japan 27 1.9k 1.3× 678 1.0× 79 0.7× 25 0.4× 45 0.8× 78 1.9k
T. D. Oswalt United States 21 1.4k 1.0× 580 0.8× 121 1.1× 22 0.4× 72 1.4× 77 1.4k
Eiji Kambe Japan 23 1.7k 1.2× 670 1.0× 85 0.8× 19 0.3× 75 1.4× 90 1.8k
R. Drimmel Italy 15 1.4k 1.0× 606 0.9× 69 0.7× 40 0.6× 78 1.5× 39 1.5k
Antonino Marasco Italy 25 1.4k 1.0× 553 0.8× 207 2.0× 35 0.6× 46 0.9× 53 1.4k
M. Dall’Ora Italy 24 1.4k 1.0× 629 0.9× 128 1.2× 19 0.3× 73 1.4× 89 1.4k
Jason S. Kalirai United States 26 1.9k 1.3× 942 1.4× 168 1.6× 18 0.3× 35 0.7× 73 2.0k
Enrico M. Di Teodoro United States 20 1.2k 0.8× 507 0.7× 162 1.5× 37 0.6× 48 0.9× 43 1.3k
E. J. Alfaro Spain 20 1.5k 1.0× 629 0.9× 80 0.8× 32 0.5× 109 2.1× 130 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by G. M. Seabroke

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. M. Seabroke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. M. Seabroke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. M. Seabroke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. M. Seabroke

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. M. Seabroke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. M. Seabroke. The network helps show where G. M. Seabroke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. M. Seabroke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. M. Seabroke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. M. Seabroke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. M. Seabroke. G. M. Seabroke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kawata, Daisuke, et al.. (2024). Impacts of the Local arm on the local circular velocity inferred from the Gaia DR3 young stars in the Milky Way. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 529(2). 1035–1046. 1 indexed citations
2.
Kawata, Daisuke, Junichi Baba, John Douglas Hunt, et al.. (2021). Galactic bar resonances inferred from kinematically hot stars in Gaia EDR3. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 508(1). 728–736. 28 indexed citations
3.
Hall, David, C. Crowley, J. Skottfelt, et al.. (2020). Gaia CCDs: charge transfer inefficiency measurements between five years of flight. 29–29. 2 indexed citations
4.
Boubert, Douglas, Jay Strader, David S. Aguado, et al.. (2019). Lessons from the curious case of the ‘fastest’ star in Gaia DR2. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 486(2). 2618–2630. 36 indexed citations
5.
Just, A., Oleksiy Golubov, Q. A. Parker, et al.. (2018). The local rotation curve of the Milky Way based on SEGUE and RAVE data. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 9 indexed citations
6.
Sartoretti, P., M. David, R. Blomme, & G. M. Seabroke. (2018). Gaia DR2 documentation Chapter 6: Spectroscopy. 6. 1 indexed citations
7.
Antoja, T., A. Helmi, M. Romero-Gómez, et al.. (2018). A dynamically young and perturbed Milky Way disk. Nature. 561(7723). 360–362. 326 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Antoja, T., G. Kordopatis, A. Helmi, et al.. (2017). Asymmetric metallicity patterns in the stellar velocity space with RAVE. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 5 indexed citations
9.
McMillan, P. J., G. Kordopatis, Andrea Kunder, et al.. (2017). Improved distances to stars common to TGAS and RAVE. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
10.
Ciucă, Ioana, Daisuke Kawata, Jane Lin, et al.. (2017). The vertical metallicity gradients of mono-age stellar populations in the Milky Way with the RAVE and Gaia data. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 475(1). 1203–1212. 9 indexed citations
11.
Wojno, Jennifer, G. Kordopatis, Matthias Steinmetz, et al.. (2016). Chemical separation of disc components using RAVE. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 461(4). 4246–4255. 30 indexed citations
12.
Antoja, T., G. Monari, A. Helmi, et al.. (2015). THE IMPRINTS OF THE GALACTIC BAR ON THE THICK DISK WITH RAVE. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 800(2). L32–L32. 9 indexed citations
13.
Bienaymé, O., Benoît Famaey, A. Siebert, et al.. (2014). Weighing the local dark matter with RAVE red clump stars. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 70 indexed citations
14.
Binney, James, B. Burnett, P. J. McMillan, et al.. (2013). New distances to RAVE stars. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 437(1). 351–370. 52 indexed citations
15.
Gilmore, G., R. F. G. Wyse, Matthias Steinmetz, et al.. (2013). In the thick of it: metal-poor disc stars in RAVE. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 436(4). 3231–3246. 44 indexed citations
16.
Pasetto, S., E. K. Grebel, T. Zwitter, et al.. (2012). Thin disk kinematics from RAVE and the solar motion. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 547. A71–A71. 27 indexed citations
17.
Bilir, S., et al.. (2011). Identification of field dwarfs and giants in the second Radial Velocity Experiment Data Release. UCL Discovery (University College London). 1 indexed citations
18.
Ak, S., S. Bilir, S. Karaali, et al.. (2011). Local stellar kinematics from RAVE data - II. Radial metallicity gradient. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 419(4). 2844–2854. 31 indexed citations
19.
Ruchti, G., J. P. Fulbright, Rosemary F. Ġ. Wyse, et al.. (2011). METAL-POOR LITHIUM-RICH GIANTS IN THE RADIAL VELOCITY EXPERIMENT SURVEY. The Astrophysical Journal. 743(2). 107–107. 42 indexed citations
20.
Seabroke, G. M.. (2008). Probing the Milky Way galaxy through thick and thin (discs and halo) with the Correlation Radial Velocities (CORAVEL) and Radial Velocity Experiment (RAVE) surveys. Observatory. 128. 520–521.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026