Countries citing papers authored by David Polishook
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of David Polishook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Polishook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Polishook more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Polishook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Polishook. The network helps show where David Polishook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Polishook
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Polishook.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Polishook based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with David Polishook. David Polishook is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mommert, Michael, Matthew M. Knight, Joseph L. Hora, et al.. (2018). Systematic Characterization and Monitoring of Potentially Active Asteroids: The Case of Don Quixote. 50.
6.
Moskovitz, Nicholas, Audrey Thirouin, Michael Mommert, et al.. (2017). The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS): Project Status. DPS.
7.
Polishook, David, Seth A. Jacobson, & O. Aharonson. (2016). Shared origin for seven of Mars Trojans - impact ejecta from Mars?. 48.1 indexed citations
8.
Osip, D. J., A. S. Rivkin, Petr Pravec, et al.. (2016). The Observing Working Group for the Asteroid Impact & Delfection Assessment (AIDA) Mission. 48.
9.
Moskovitz, Nicholas, Audrey Thirouin, Richard P. Binzel, et al.. (2015). The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS) -- Science Highlights. 29. 2255616.
10.
Moskovitz, Nicholas, David Polishook, F. E. DeMeo, et al.. (2014). Detection of aspect-dependent thermal emission as a signature of near-Earth asteroid pole orientation. 367.1 indexed citations
11.
Moskovitz, Nicholas, David Polishook, Cristina A. Thomas, et al.. (2014). The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS): Project Overview. DPS.1 indexed citations
12.
Moskovitz, Nicholas, Tim Lister, Barbara J. Ryan, et al.. (2013). The Near-Earth Flyby of Asteroid 2012 DA14. DPS.1 indexed citations
13.
Polishook, David. (2013). Fast Rotation of the NEA 2012 TC4 Indicates a Monolithic Structure. 40(1). 42–43.1 indexed citations
14.
Binzel, Richard P., F. E. DeMeo, T. H. Burbine, et al.. (2012). Cracking the Space Weathering Code: Ordinary Chondrite Asteroids in the Near-Earth Population.1 indexed citations
15.
Polishook, David. (2012). Lightcurves and Spin Periods of Near-Earth Asteroids, The Wise Observatory, 2005 - 2010. 39(3). 187–192.1 indexed citations
16.
Polishook, David. (2012). Studying Spin Axis of Primary Components of Binary Asteroids and Asteroid Pairs. 1667. 6487.1 indexed citations
Polishook, David. (2011). Rotation Period of the "Asteroid Pair" (25884) 2000 SQ4. 38(2). 94–95.4 indexed citations
20.
Polishook, David. (2009). Lightcurves for Shape Modeling Obtained at the Wise Observatory. The Minor planet bulletin. 36. 119.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.