Nia Coupe
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Sarah CotterillSarah KnowlesSarah PetersCarolyn Chew‐GrahamPeter CoventryIsabel AdeyemiMichael R. SpenceFelicity Goodyear‐Smith
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers)Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers)Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomQatarUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nia Coupe
17 papers receiving 447 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- General Health Professions 254
- Clinical Psychology 100
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 90
- Social Psychology 85
- Epidemiology 63
Countries citing papers authored by Nia Coupe
This map shows the geographic impact of Nia Coupe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nia Coupe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nia Coupe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nia Coupe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nia Coupe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nia Coupe. The network helps show where Nia Coupe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nia Coupe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nia Coupe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nia Coupe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nia Coupe. Nia Coupe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 101 | |
| 11 | 63 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | Evaluation of the National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme Demonstrator Site in Salford: Understanding the Salford IGR Care Call Service Model | 2 |
| 14 | Identifying the roles of community and enhanced GP referral services in the recruitment and retention of people to diabetes prevention programmes in Salford | 1 |
| 15 | 58 | |
| 16 | 66 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 38 |
About Nia Coupe
Nia Coupe is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Health Professions and Speech and Hearing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (5 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers) and Chronic Disease Management Strategies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (254 citations), Pharmacy (35 citations) and Applied Psychology (36 citations). Nia Coupe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Qatar and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Cotterill, Sarah Knowles, Sarah Peters, Carolyn Chew‐Graham, Peter Coventry, Isabel Adeyemi, Michael R. Spence, Felicity Goodyear‐Smith, A. McL Mathieson and Susan J. Howard. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Public Health, Obesity Reviews and Schizophrenia Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.