Neon Brooks
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Language and Linguistics top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- David BarnerAlan BaleSusan Goldin‐MeadowElizabeth S. SpelkeShari LiuMichael C. FrankDavid M. MosenMatthew P. Banegas
- Topics
- Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers)Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers)Language Development and Disorders (5 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesThe Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismChild Development
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Neon Brooks
29 papers receiving 605 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 311
- Cognitive Neuroscience 133
- Language and Linguistics 111
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 107
- Social Psychology 89
Countries citing papers authored by Neon Brooks
This map shows the geographic impact of Neon Brooks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neon Brooks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neon Brooks more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neon Brooks
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neon Brooks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neon Brooks. The network helps show where Neon Brooks may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neon Brooks
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neon Brooks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neon Brooks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neon Brooks. Neon Brooks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 60 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 187 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Neon Brooks
Neon Brooks is a scholar working on Statistics and Probability, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (8 papers) and Language Development and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (311 citations), Language and Linguistics (111 citations) and Statistics and Probability (87 citations). Neon Brooks has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include David Barner, Alan Bale, Susan Goldin‐Meadow, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Shari Liu, Michael C. Frank, David M. Mosen, Matthew P. Banegas, Eliza Congdon and Miriam A. Novack. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Child Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.