Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Psychosocial effects of perceived emotional synchrony in collective gatherings.
2015227 citationsDarío Páez, Bernard Rimé et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Nekane Basabe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nekane Basabe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nekane Basabe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nekane Basabe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nekane Basabe. The network helps show where Nekane Basabe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nekane Basabe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nekane Basabe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nekane Basabe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Nekane Basabe. Nekane Basabe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Basabe, Nekane, et al.. (2009). Vivir en diálisis: factores biopsicosociales asociados a las estrategias de afrontamiento y calidad de vida. Metas de Enfermería. 12(4). 65–72.2 indexed citations
Zlobina, Anna, Nekane Basabe, Darío Páez, & Adrian Furnham. (2006). Sociocultural adjustment of immigrants. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
13.
Basabe, Nekane & María Ros. (2005). Cultural dimensions and social behavior correlates: Individualism-Collectivism and Power Distance.. International Review of Social Psychology. 18. 189–224.138 indexed citations
14.
Rimé, Bernard, Darío Páez, & Nekane Basabe. (2004). Efectos y procesos psicosociales de la participación en manifestaciones después del atentado del 11 de Marzo. Ansiedad y Estrés. 10(2). 247–263.5 indexed citations
15.
Fernández, Itziar, Nekane Basabe, H. Grad, & Darío Páez. (2001). Valores culturales y motivación: creencias de auto-concepto de Singelis, actitudes de competición de Triandis, control emocional e individualismo-colectivismo vertical-horizontal. 4(8). 2.6 indexed citations
16.
Bermejo, Paulo Henrique de Souza, et al.. (2001). Formas de afrontamiento y afectividad en personas con VIH/SIDA. Psiquis: Revista de psiquiatría, psicología médica y psicosomática. 22(5). 30–35.6 indexed citations
17.
Basabe, Nekane, Darío Páez, José Valencia, et al.. (2000). Sociocultural factors predicting subjective experience of emotion:a collective level analysis. Psicothema. 12(1). 55–69.43 indexed citations
18.
Basabe, Nekane, Darío Páez, José Valencia, et al.. (2000). Sociocultural factors predicting subjective experience of emotion. Psicothema. 12. 55–69.8 indexed citations
19.
Páez, Darío & Nekane Basabe. (1999). Introducción. Memoria colectiva de hechos políticos e identidad social.. 7–10.3 indexed citations
20.
Basabe, Nekane, et al.. (1970). Grupos de autoayuda y enfermedad mental.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.