Neil J. Baker
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Co-authors
- Robert FreedmanLawrence E. AdlerHerbert T. NagamotoGreg A. GerhardtCarla DrebingMerilyne C. WaldoRonald D. FranksNicholas A. Cummings
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesMexicoIsrael
In The Last Decade
Neil J. Baker
22 papers receiving 769 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cognitive Neuroscience 378
- Psychiatry and Mental health 265
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 156
- Molecular Biology 130
- General Health Professions 113
Countries citing papers authored by Neil J. Baker
This map shows the geographic impact of Neil J. Baker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neil J. Baker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neil J. Baker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neil J. Baker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neil J. Baker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neil J. Baker. The network helps show where Neil J. Baker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neil J. Baker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neil J. Baker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neil J. Baker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neil J. Baker. Neil J. Baker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 49 | |
| 3 | HIDDEN IN PLAIN VIEW: BARRIERS TO QUALITY IMPROVEMENT. | 8 |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 100 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 101 | |
| 12 | 125 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 105 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Electroconvulsive Therapy and Severe Osteoporosis: Use of a Nerve Stimulator to Assess Paralysis. | 1 |
| 20 | 10 |
About Neil J. Baker
Neil J. Baker is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry and Mental health and Behavioral Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 819 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (9 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (6 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (378 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (265 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (27 citations). Neil J. Baker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Robert Freedman, Lawrence E. Adler, Herbert T. Nagamoto, Greg A. Gerhardt, Carla Drebing, Merilyne C. Waldo, Ronald D. Franks, Nicholas A. Cummings, Janet L. Cummings and Ellen Cawthra. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Psychiatry Research and Schizophrenia Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.