Megan Keyes

917 citations
12 papers · 723 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Megan Keyes

12 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Megan Keyes
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 224
  • Clinical Psychology 261
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 243
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 104
Replace Michelle VanTieghem with:
Michelle VanTieghem United States
Cory A. Burghy United States
Nineequa Q. Blanding United States
Christoph Mueller‐Pfeiffer Switzerland
Matthew J. Sutterer United States
Daniel V. Zuj Australia
Rianne A. de Kleine Netherlands
Steve Southwick United States
Arthur R. Rademaker Netherlands
Mahur M. Hashemi Netherlands
Megan Keyes relative to Michelle VanTieghem United States Michelle VanTieghem's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Michelle VanTieghem · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Megan Keyes

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Megan Keyes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Megan Keyes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Megan Keyes more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Megan Keyes

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Megan Keyes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Megan Keyes. The network helps show where Megan Keyes may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Megan Keyes, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Megan Keyes Line = papers co-authored together Megan Keyes links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009248
2 2007176
3 2005125
4 200664
5 200824
6 200019
7 200616
8
The first thousand days: an evidence paper - summary
201716
9 201714
10 200712
11 20118
12 20101

About Megan Keyes

Megan Keyes is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 12 papers that have together received 723 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (3 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (3 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (2 papers) and Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (224 citations), Clinical Psychology (261 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (243 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (104 citations). Megan Keyes has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Erica Duncan, Tanja Jovanović, Karyn M. Myers, Ana M. Fiallos, Seth D. Norrholm, Michael Davis, Michael Davis, Jillian C. Shipherd, David J. Ready and Barbara Lewison. Their work appears in journals such as Psychiatry Research, Schizophrenia Research, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Personality Assessment and Psychophysiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact