Nathaniel Ming Curran

529 citations
30 papers · 330 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Multilingual Education and Policy (14 papers)Asian Culture and Media Studies (9 papers)EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers)

In The Last Decade

Nathaniel Ming Curran

26 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers

Nathaniel Ming Curran
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Sociology and Political Science 102
  • Linguistics and Language 87
  • Literature and Literary Theory 73
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 70
  • Language and Linguistics 60
Replace Kevin M. Wong with:
Kevin M. Wong United States
Emilia Djonov Australia
Jennifer Higgs United States
Zuraidah Mohd Don Malaysia
Jungmin Kwon United States
Esmat Babaii Iran
Kathleen A. J. Mohr United States
Bernadette Charlier Switzerland
Bee Hoon Tan Malaysia
Khalil Motallebzadeh Iran
Nathaniel Ming Curran relative to Kevin M. Wong United States Kevin M. Wong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.4×
Kevin M. Wong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel Ming Curran

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel Ming Curran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel Ming Curran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel Ming Curran more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel Ming Curran

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel Ming Curran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel Ming Curran. The network helps show where Nathaniel Ming Curran may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel Ming Curran

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel Ming Curran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel Ming Curran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel Ming Curran. Nathaniel Ming Curran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 1
4 0
5 5
6 3
7 5
8 20
9 5
10 1
11 7
12 26
13 15
14
Digital Feminism and Affective Splintering: South Korean Twitter Discourse on 500 Yemeni Refugees
6
15
Intersectional English(es) and the Gig Economy: Teaching English Online
19
16 1
17 1
18 109
19 4
20 12

About Nathaniel Ming Curran

Nathaniel Ming Curran is a scholar working on Linguistics and Language, Cultural Studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 30 papers that have together received 330 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multilingual Education and Policy (14 papers), Asian Culture and Media Studies (9 papers) and EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (87 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (73 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (33 citations). Nathaniel Ming Curran has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, United States and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Joo-Wha Hong, Christopher J. Jenks, Jingyi Sun, Hernán Galperín, Sung Woo Kim, Chris Jenks, Hans J. Ladegaard and Longen Zhou. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Linguistics, Information Communication & Society and Leisure Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026