Nathan W. Pino

1.1k citations
46 papers · 644 indexed · h-index 13

Nathan W. Pino

43 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Nathan W. Pino
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Gender Studies 151
  • Health 90
  • Information Systems and Management 59
  • Safety Research 70
  • Sociology and Political Science 336
Replace Tuomas Pekkarinen with:
Tuomas Pekkarinen Finland
Hülya Koşar Altinyelken Netherlands
Robert J. Boeckmann United States
Malin Åkerström Sweden
Joan Z. Spade United States
Sophie Rudolph Australia
Paula Maurutto Canada
Larry L. Tifft United States
Bronwyn Carlson Australia
Pascale Molinier France
Nathan W. Pino relative to Tuomas Pekkarinen Finland Tuomas Pekkarinen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.9×
Tuomas Pekkarinen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan W. Pino

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan W. Pino's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan W. Pino with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan W. Pino more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan W. Pino

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan W. Pino. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan W. Pino. The network helps show where Nathan W. Pino may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Nathan W. Pino, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan W. Pino Line = papers co-authored together Nathan W. Pino links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20240
2 20192
3 20191
4 201712
5 201725
6
The death and resurrection of deviance : current ideas and research
20143
7 20146
8 20143
9 20145
10 20127
11 201226
12 201236
13 20124
14
Academic Dishonesty, Alcohol and Marijuana Use, and the Transition to College
20094
15
Developing Democratic Policing in the Caribbean: The Case of Trinidad and Tobago
20099
16
Gender Differences in the Academic Ethic and Academic Achievement
200592
17
College Students, the Academic Ethic, and Academic Achievement
20056
18 200411
19
College Students and Academic Dishonesty
200354
20 1999130

About Nathan W. Pino

Nathan W. Pino is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 644 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crime Patterns and Interventions (13 papers), Policing Practices and Perceptions (12 papers), Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses (6 papers), Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance (5 papers), Crime, Deviance, and Social Control (5 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (4 papers), Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (3 papers) and Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (151 citations), Health (90 citations) and Information Systems and Management (59 citations). Nathan W. Pino has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Fiji. Frequent co-authors include William L. Smith, Robert F. Meier, Graham Ellison, Kyong Hee Chee, Michael D. Wiatrowski, Jarrett Blaustein, Hassan Tajalli, Chad L. Smith, Kate Fitz‐Gibbon and Richard White. Their work appears in journals such as Sustainability, Sex Roles and The British Journal of Criminology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026