Nathan King
Impact in
- Health top 5%
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Papers in
-
- COVID-19 and Mental Health 3
- Resilience and Mental Health 3
- Health 11
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology 9
- Co-authors
- William Pickett (42 shared papers)Valerie Michaelson (17 shared papers)Anne Duffy (19 shared papers)Daniel Rivera (12 shared papers)Ian Janssen (5 shared papers)Simone Cunningham (12 shared papers)Kate Saunders (8 shared papers)Sophie D. Walsh (4 shared papers)
- Journals
- Preventive Medicine (4 papers)BJPsych Open (4 papers)Journal of American College Health (4 papers)BMJ Open (3 papers)BMC Public Health (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Nathan King
63 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Nathan King's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Health 133
- Social Psychology 316
- Clinical Psychology 294
- Applied Psychology 67
- General Health Professions 167
Countries citing papers authored by Nathan King
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan King more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan King
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan King. The network helps show where Nathan King may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 66 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Social Media Use and Cyber-Bullying: A Cross-National Analysis of Young People in 42 Countries Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 242 |
| 2 | 2020 | 127 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 62 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 48 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 42 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 41 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 41 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 37 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 31 | |
| 12 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2019 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 18 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 14 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 13 |
About Nathan King
Nathan King is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (9 papers), Agriculture and Farm Safety (7 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (7 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (4 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (3 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (3 papers) and Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (133 citations), Social Psychology (316 citations), Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Applied Psychology (67 citations) and General Health Professions (167 citations). Nathan King has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include William Pickett, Valerie Michaelson, Anne Duffy, Daniel Rivera, Ian Janssen, Simone Cunningham, Kate Saunders, Sophie D. Walsh, Wendy Craig and Colleen Davison. Their work appears in journals such as Preventive Medicine, BJPsych Open, Journal of American College Health, BMJ Open and BMC Public Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.