Christopher R. Bowie
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.05%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Philip D. HarveyThomas L. PattersonBrent T. MausbachRobert K. HeatonAbraham ReichenbergMichael W. BestColin A. DeppMaya Gupta
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (142 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (57 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (54 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEAmerican Journal of Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Christopher R. Bowie
211 papers receiving 10.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
- Psychiatry and Mental health 7.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.2k
- Philosophy 2.1k
- Clinical Psychology 2.1k
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher R. Bowie
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher R. Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher R. Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher R. Bowie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher R. Bowie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher R. Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher R. Bowie. The network helps show where Christopher R. Bowie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher R. Bowie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher R. Bowie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher R. Bowie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher R. Bowie. Christopher R. Bowie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 117 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 103 | |
| 20 | 354 |
About Christopher R. Bowie
Christopher R. Bowie is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 222 papers that have together received 10.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (142 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (57 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (54 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (7.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (709 citations) and Philosophy (2.1k citations). Christopher R. Bowie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Philip D. Harvey, Thomas L. Patterson, Brent T. Mausbach, Robert K. Heaton, Abraham Reichenberg, Michael W. Best, Colin A. Depp, Maya Gupta, Margaret M. McClure and Katherine Holshausen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and American Journal of Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.