Christopher R. Bowie

14.9k citations
222 papers · 10.4k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 48

Christopher R. Bowie

211 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Hit Papers

Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test9712006202620122019250500750

Peers

Christopher R. Bowie
Comparison fields: 5 of 153
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 7.1k
  • Biological Psychiatry 709
  • Philosophy 2.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 2.2k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 2.8k
Replace Silvana Galderisi with:
Silvana Galderisi Italy
Robert S. Kern United States
Lieuwe de Haan Netherlands
Joseph Ventura United States
Susan R. McGurk United States
W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker Austria
Lucia Valmaggia United Kingdom
Gerhard Hellemann United States
Konstantine K. Zakzanis Canada
Rajiv Tandon United States
Christopher R. Bowie relative to Silvana Galderisi Italy Silvana Galderisi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Silvana Galderisi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Christopher R. Bowie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher R. Bowie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher R. Bowie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher R. Bowie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher R. Bowie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher R. Bowie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher R. Bowie. The network helps show where Christopher R. Bowie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Christopher R. Bowie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Christopher R. Bowie Line = papers co-authored together Christopher R. Bowie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20251
3 20250
4 20250
5 20240
6 20240
7 20240
8 20231
9 20231
10 202213
11 20225
12 20213
13 20217
14 20219
15 2020117
16 202021
17 201932
18 201345
19 2013103
20 2005354

About Christopher R. Bowie

Christopher R. Bowie is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 222 papers that have together received 10.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (142 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (57 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (54 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (43 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (40 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (34 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (21 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (7.1k citations), Biological Psychiatry (709 citations) and Philosophy (2.1k citations). Christopher R. Bowie has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Philip D. Harvey, Thomas L. Patterson, Brent T. Mausbach, Robert K. Heaton, Abraham Reichenberg, Michael W. Best, Colin A. Depp, Maya Gupta, Margaret M. McClure and Katherine Holshausen. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Research, Schizophrenia Bulletin, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Early Intervention in Psychiatry and American Journal of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026