Daniel Frings

2.2k citations
86 papers · 1.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Frings

81 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Frings
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Applied Psychology 397
  • Clinical Psychology 365
  • Social Psychology 352
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 169
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 19
Replace Ian P. Albery with:
Ian P. Albery United Kingdom
Kristen P. Lindgren United States
Matthis Morgenstern Germany
Michael J. Cleveland United States
Gina Agostinelli United States
Abby L. Goldstein Canada
Justin F. Hummer United States
Shari Kessel Schneider United States
Irene M. Geisner United States
Alida Benthin United States
Daniel Frings relative to Ian P. Albery United Kingdom Ian P. Albery's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Ian P. Albery · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Frings

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Frings's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Frings with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Frings more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Frings

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Frings. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Frings. The network helps show where Daniel Frings may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Frings, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Frings Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Frings links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 86 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2015162
2 2013159
3 2014115
4 201694
5 201874
6 201442
7 202036
8 201234
9 201632
10 202228
11 200627
12 201226
13 201825
14 201225
15 201624
16 201124
17 201922
18 201520
19 200720
20 201420

About Daniel Frings

Daniel Frings is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, Clinical Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 86 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (39 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (22 papers), Smoking Behavior and Cessation (14 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (9 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (7 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (5 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (397 citations), Clinical Psychology (365 citations), Social Psychology (352 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (169 citations) and Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (19 citations). Daniel Frings has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ian P. Albery, Tegan Cruwys, Genevieve A. Dingle, Sarah Buckingham, Marcantonio M. Spada, Antony C. Moss, Dominic Abrams, Daniel C. Kolubinski, Sharon Cox and Claudia Marino. Their work appears in journals such as Addictive Behaviors, Group Dynamics Theory Research and Practice, Addictive Behaviors Reports, BMJ Open and Addiction.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact