Nathan Cramer

1.7k citations
32 papers · 1.1k indexed · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Nathan Cramer

31 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Nathan Cramer
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Developmental Neuroscience 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 288
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 94
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 45
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 223
Replace Jérôme Clasadonte with:
Jérôme Clasadonte United States
Sherie Ma Australia
Charles Marshall China
Heather A. Bimonte United States
Bassem F. El‐Khodor United States
Izabela Kuchna United States
Asaf Marco Israel
Astrid Vallès Netherlands
Nikolai Lazarov Bulgaria
Melissa R. Stasko United States
Nathan Cramer relative to Jérôme Clasadonte United States Jérôme Clasadonte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jérôme Clasadonte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nathan Cramer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nathan Cramer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathan Cramer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathan Cramer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nathan Cramer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathan Cramer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathan Cramer. The network helps show where Nathan Cramer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nathan Cramer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nathan Cramer Line = papers co-authored together Nathan Cramer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010170
2 2016166
3 202091
4 201869
5 201163
6 201258
7 200643
8 201241
9 202240
10 201040
11 200737
12 202130
13 201929
14 201827
15 202027
16 201526
17 200525
18 202224
19 201123
20 201518

About Nathan Cramer

Nathan Cramer is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Behavioral Neuroscience and Physiology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (8 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers), Down syndrome and intellectual disability research (6 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (5 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (5 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (4 papers), High Altitude and Hypoxia (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (94 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (288 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (94 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (223 citations). Nathan Cramer has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Zygmunt Galdzicki, Asaf Keller, Tarik F. Haydar, Tyler K. Best, Lina Chakrabarti, John Isaac, Rosalind S.E. Carney, Ronald M. Harris‐Warrick, Andreas Husch and Olivia Uddin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Neurophysiology, Experimental Neurology, eNeuro and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026