A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL.

479 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2000, received 479 indexed citations. Written by Stefanie E. Naumann and Nathan Bennett covering the research area of Law. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (347 citations), Sociology and Political Science (158 citations) and Social Psychology (141 citations). Published in Academy of Management Journal.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.2307/1556416 →

Countries where authors are citing A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL.

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL. more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL.

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A CASE FOR PROCEDURAL JUSTICE CLIMATE: DEVELOPMENT AND TEST OF A MULTILEVEL MODEL..

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.2307/1556416.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026