Mark S. Reed

27.3k total citations · 14 hit papers
180 papers, 17.5k citations indexed

About

Mark S. Reed is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Reed has authored 180 papers receiving a total of 17.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 85 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 39 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and 36 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Reed's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (37 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (24 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (23 papers). Mark S. Reed is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (37 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (24 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (23 papers). Mark S. Reed collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Mark S. Reed's co-authors include Lindsay C. Stringer, Andrew J. Dougill, Christina Prell, Klaus Hubacek, Evan Fraser, Anna C. Evely, Claire H. Quinn, Ioan Fazey, Joe Morris and Anil Graves and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Reed

175 papers receiving 16.5k citations

Hit Papers

Stakeholder participation... 2005 2026 2012 2019 2008 2009 2010 2010 2005 500 1000 1.5k 2.0k 2.5k

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mark S. Reed 7.9k 4.0k 3.3k 2.9k 1.8k 180 17.5k
Lindsay C. Stringer 6.5k 0.8× 2.8k 0.7× 2.7k 0.8× 2.3k 0.8× 2.1k 1.1× 266 15.0k
Lance Gunderson 9.6k 1.2× 3.1k 0.8× 4.1k 1.2× 4.4k 1.5× 904 0.5× 96 19.1k
Will Steffen 9.6k 1.2× 4.0k 1.0× 4.6k 1.4× 4.4k 1.5× 829 0.5× 150 29.0k
Marco A. Janssen 6.1k 0.8× 2.2k 0.5× 3.8k 1.2× 1.4k 0.5× 970 0.5× 236 14.9k
Claudia Pahl‐Wostl 8.0k 1.0× 2.4k 0.6× 3.8k 1.1× 1.3k 0.5× 737 0.4× 211 17.3k
Garry Peterson 12.4k 1.6× 2.8k 0.7× 2.6k 0.8× 4.4k 1.5× 882 0.5× 117 20.0k
Arun Agrawal 12.3k 1.5× 3.5k 0.9× 4.8k 1.4× 2.8k 1.0× 3.2k 1.7× 187 20.9k
Katrina Brown 5.6k 0.7× 2.7k 0.7× 4.7k 1.4× 2.0k 0.7× 1.3k 0.7× 117 12.5k
Belinda Reyers 7.6k 1.0× 3.0k 0.7× 1.9k 0.6× 3.3k 1.2× 637 0.3× 109 16.7k
Reinette Biggs 4.5k 0.6× 2.2k 0.6× 1.9k 0.6× 2.2k 0.8× 673 0.4× 58 12.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Reed. The network helps show where Mark S. Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Reed. Mark S. Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glass, Jayne, et al.. (2025). Natural capital approaches to decision-making for collaborative landscape governance. Environmental Science & Policy. 171. 104133–104133. 2 indexed citations
2.
Reed, Mark S., et al.. (2025). Governing high-integrity markets for ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services. 75. 101760–101760.
3.
Reed, Mark S., et al.. (2024). CANCER-ASSOCIATED THROMBOTIC MICROANGIOPATHY. CHEST Journal. 166(4). A2317–A2318.
4.
Efstathiou, C., Carlie J. Coats, Robert Zelt, et al.. (2024). Enabling high-performance cloud computing for the Community Multiscale Air Quality Model (CMAQ) version 5.3.3: performance evaluation and benefits for the user community. Geoscientific model development. 17(18). 7001–7027. 1 indexed citations
5.
Reed, Mark S., Eric Jensen, Helen Kendall, et al.. (2024). Analyzing who is relevant to engage in environmental decision-making processes by interests, influence and impact: The 3i framework. Journal of Environmental Management. 373. 123437–123437. 5 indexed citations
6.
Raymond, Christopher M., Paul Hirsch, Bryan G. Norton, Andrew M. Scott, & Mark S. Reed. (2023). Rethinking Appropriateness of Actions in Environmental Decisions: Connecting Interest and Identity Negotiation with Plural Valuation. Environmental Values. 32(6). 739–764. 3 indexed citations
7.
Reed, Mark S. & Pete Barbrook-Johnson. (2022). Complex systems methods for impact evaluation: lessons from the evaluation of an environmental boundary organisation. Mires and Peat. 28. 34–34.
8.
Reed, Mark S., Thomas P. Curtis, Arjan Gosal, et al.. (2022). Integrating ecosystem markets to co-ordinate landscape-scale public benefits from nature. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 25 indexed citations
9.
Reed, Mark S., et al.. (2022). Improving the evidence base for delivery of public goods from public money in agri-environment schemes. Emerald Open Research. 1(10). 2 indexed citations
10.
Reed, Mark S., Dylan M. Young, Nigel G. Taylor, et al.. (2022). Peatland core domain sets: building consensus on what should be measured in research and monitoring. Mires and Peat. 28. 26–26. 6 indexed citations
11.
König, Hannes, Silvia Ceaușu, Mark S. Reed, et al.. (2021). Integrated framework for stakeholder participation: Methods and tools for identifying and addressing human–wildlife conflicts. Conservation Science and Practice. 3(3). 41 indexed citations
12.
Reed, Mark S., et al.. (2020). Improving the evidence base for delivery of public goods from public money in agri-environment schemes. Emerald Open Research. 2. 57–57. 2 indexed citations
13.
Baird, Andy J., Chris Evans, Robert Mills, et al.. (2019). Validity of managing peatlands with fire. Nature Geoscience. 12(11). 884–885. 10 indexed citations
16.
Kenter, Jasper O., Rosalind Bryce, Mike Christie, et al.. (2016). Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions. Ecosystem Services. 21. 358–371. 148 indexed citations
17.
Bonn, Aletta, Mark S. Reed, Chris Evans, et al.. (2014). Investing in nature: Developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosystem Services. 9. 54–65. 119 indexed citations
18.
Sallu, Susannah M., Natalie Suckall, & Mark S. Reed. (2009). Participatory methods training in Malawi. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 1 indexed citations
19.
Rowson, James, Fred Worrall, Martin Evans, et al.. (2007). The potential for carbon storage in UK peatlands. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007. 2 indexed citations
20.
Hubacek, Klaus, Christina Prell, Claire H. Quinn, & Mark S. Reed. (2006). Stakeholder selection as a precondition for successful participatory processes. Hepatology Communications. 3(11). 1482–1495. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026