Forensic Science International Genetics

70.5k citations
2.7k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

  • Genetics top 2%
    • Forensic and Genetic Research
    • Genetic diversity and population structure
    • Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Archeology top 1%
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Papers in

    • Forensic and Genetic Research 2.0k
    • Genetic diversity and population structure 426
    • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology 244
    • Race, Genetics, and Society 210
    • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications 1.3k
    • Identification and Quantification in Food 260

Forensic Science International Genetics

2.6k papers receiving 67.9k citations

Peers

Forensic Science International Genetics
Comparison fields: 5 of 218
  • Genetics 51.5k
  • Archeology 7.0k
  • Molecular Biology 43.3k
  • Ecology 12.2k
  • Safety Research 1.6k
Replace International Journal of Legal Medicine with:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Germany
Annals of Human Genetics United Kingdom
BioTechniques United States
Nature Ecology & Evolution United States
European Journal of Human Genetics United States
BMC Evolutionary Biology United States
Science & Justice United Kingdom
Legal Medicine Japan
Nature Reviews Genetics United States
Journal of Proteomics China
Forensic Science International Genetics relative to International Journal of Legal Medicine Germany International Journal of Legal Medicine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
International Journal of Legal Medicine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Forensic Science International Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forensic Science International Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forensic Science International Genetics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics.

About Forensic Science International Genetics

The 2.7k papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 70.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Forensic Science International Genetics usually cover Genetics (2.2k papers), Molecular Biology (1.8k papers), Archeology (272 papers), Ecology (430 papers) and Cancer Research (82 papers) specifically the topics of Forensic and Genetic Research (2.0k papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (1.3k papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (426 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (370 papers), Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (265 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (260 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (244 papers) and Race, Genetics, and Society (210 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forensic Science International Genetics are Walther Parson, Manfred Kayser, Niels Morling, Christopher Phillips, John Buckleton, Duncan Taylor, Peter Gill, Peter M. Schneider, Jo‐Anne Bright and Titia Sijen.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact