David Arthur

1.2k citations
49 papers · 821 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

David Arthur

48 papers receiving 747 citations

Peers

David Arthur
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Research and Theory 86
  • Leadership and Management 47
  • Clinical Psychology 251
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 13
  • General Health Professions 224
Replace Tsung‐Lan Chu with:
Tsung‐Lan Chu Taiwan
Camellia Torabizadeh Iran
Victoria Pitt Australia
Hossein Ebrahimi Iran
Danita Alfred United States
Hsiang‐Chu Pai Taiwan
Beata Dobrowolska Poland
Verónica V. Márquez‐Hernández Spain
Maj‐Britt Råholm Norway
Cheryle Moss Australia
David Arthur relative to Tsung‐Lan Chu Taiwan Tsung‐Lan Chu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Tsung‐Lan Chu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Arthur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Arthur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Arthur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Arthur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Arthur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Arthur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Arthur. The network helps show where David Arthur may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Arthur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Arthur Line = papers co-authored together David Arthur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 49 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001123
2 199885
3
The professional self-concept of nurses: a review of the literature from 1992-2006.
200770
4 199946
5 199844
6 200939
7 200838
8 200834
9 201334
10 197527
11 200022
12 201719
13 201018
14 200417
15 201116
16 200016
17 200214
18 200214
19 201413
20 201911

About David Arthur

David Arthur is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental health, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 49 papers that have together received 821 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Treatment and Access (6 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (5 papers), Nursing education and management (4 papers), Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (4 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (4 papers), Nursing Diagnosis and Documentation (3 papers) and Intimate Partner and Family Violence (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (86 citations), Leadership and Management (47 citations), Clinical Psychology (251 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations) and General Health Professions (224 citations). David Arthur has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kim Usher, Thomas Wong, Jacqueline Randle, Sally Thorne, Zheng Li, Rina Panigrahy‎, Moon Fai Chan, Fenglan Lou, Frances Kam Yuet Wong and Claudia K. Y. Lai. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Nurse Education Today and Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact