Debbie Goh

1.3k total citations · 2 hit papers
17 papers, 864 citations indexed

About

Debbie Goh is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Communication and Education. According to data from OpenAlex, Debbie Goh has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 864 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 8 papers in Communication and 5 papers in Education. Recurrent topics in Debbie Goh's work include Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (5 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). Debbie Goh is often cited by papers focused on Social Media and Politics (8 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (5 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). Debbie Goh collaborates with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Hong Kong. Debbie Goh's co-authors include Natalie Pang, Marko M. Škorić, Qinfeng Zhu, Uğur Kale, Richard Ling, Oscar Westlund, Andrew Duffy, Edson C. Tandoc, Theresa Cullen and Mete Akcaoğlu and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers in Human Behavior, New Media & Society and Information Communication & Society.

In The Last Decade

Debbie Goh

16 papers receiving 815 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review

2015 289 citations Marko M. Škorić, Qinfeng Zhu et al. New Media & Society profile →
Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework

2017 199 citations Edson C. Tandoc, Richard Ling et al. New Media & Society profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Debbie Goh Singapore	13	517	473	126	119	103	17	864
Alcides Velásquez United States	14	459 0.9×	466 1.0×	69 0.5×	61 0.5×	60 0.6×	26	754
Tanja Bosch South Africa	16	670 1.3×	453 1.0×	66 0.5×	307 2.6×	200 1.9×	56	1.1k
Lois Ann Scheidt United States	8	575 1.1×	717 1.5×	125 1.0×	136 1.1×	248 2.4×	12	1.4k
Terri L. Towner United States	13	388 0.8×	459 1.0×	58 0.5×	127 1.1×	62 0.6×	22	769
Eric Wright United States	4	296 0.6×	381 0.8×	86 0.7×	86 0.7×	159 1.5×	4	798
Alexander Halavais United States	14	269 0.5×	299 0.6×	67 0.5×	46 0.4×	148 1.4×	26	677
Seth Giddings United Kingdom	10	538 1.0×	253 0.5×	37 0.3×	131 1.1×	66 0.6×	18	900
Benjamin Gleason United States	14	410 0.8×	343 0.7×	70 0.6×	394 3.3×	176 1.7×	28	922
Paul Zube United States	9	519 1.0×	683 1.4×	127 1.0×	48 0.4×	37 0.4×	15	898
Gina Walejko United States	5	326 0.6×	327 0.7×	28 0.2×	105 0.9×	58 0.6×	12	632

Countries citing papers authored by Debbie Goh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Debbie Goh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debbie Goh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debbie Goh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Debbie Goh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debbie Goh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debbie Goh. The network helps show where Debbie Goh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debbie Goh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debbie Goh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debbie Goh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debbie Goh. Debbie Goh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Kale, Uğur, et al.. (2018). Computational What? Relating Computational Thinking to Teaching. TechTrends. 62(6). 574–584. 55 indexed citations

2.

Kale, Uğur, Mete Akcaoğlu, Theresa Cullen, & Debbie Goh. (2018). Contextual Factors Influencing Access to Teaching Computational Thinking. Computers in the Schools. 35(2). 69–87. 20 indexed citations

3.

Tandoc, Edson C., et al.. (2017). Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: A conceptual framework. New Media & Society. 20(8). 2745–2763. 199 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Goh, Debbie, et al.. (2017). News sharing as reciprocal exchanges in social cohesion maintenance. Information Communication & Society. 22(8). 1128–1144. 56 indexed citations

5.

Pang, Natalie & Debbie Goh. (2016). Are we all here for the same purpose? Social media and individualized collective action. Online Information Review. 40(4). 544–559. 12 indexed citations

6.

Goh, Debbie, et al.. (2016). Central or peripheral? Information elaboration cues on childhood vaccination in an online parenting forum. Computers in Human Behavior. 69. 181–188. 28 indexed citations

7.

Goh, Debbie & Uğur Kale. (2015). From Print to Digital Platforms. Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. 70(3). 307–323. 5 indexed citations

8.

Goh, Debbie & Uğur Kale. (2015). The urban–rural gap: project-based learning with Web 2.0 among West Virginian teachers. Technology Pedagogy and Education. 25(3). 355–376. 18 indexed citations

9.

Goh, Debbie. (2015). Narrowing the Knowledge Gap. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 92(4). 877–897. 20 indexed citations

10.

Goh, Debbie & Natalie Pang. (2015). Protesting the Singapore government: The role of collective action frames in social media mobilization. Telematics and Informatics. 33(2). 525–533. 38 indexed citations

11.

Škorić, Marko M., Qinfeng Zhu, Debbie Goh, & Natalie Pang. (2015). Social media and citizen engagement: A meta-analytic review. New Media & Society. 18(9). 1817–1839. 289 indexed citations breakdown →

12.

Pang, Natalie & Debbie Goh. (2015). Can blogs function as rhetorical publics in Asian democracies? An analysis using the case of Singapore. Telematics and Informatics. 33(2). 504–513. 6 indexed citations

13.

Goh, Debbie. (2012). WHO WE ARE AND WHAT WE WANT. Information Communication & Society. 16(7). 1019–1041. 4 indexed citations

14.

Goh, Debbie & Natalie Pang. (2012). Online and On Track? Political Party Use of Websites and Facebook During Singapore's 2011 General Election.

15.

Kale, Uğur & Debbie Goh. (2012). Teaching style, ICT experience and teachers’ attitudes toward teaching with Web 2.0. Education and Information Technologies. 19(1). 41–60. 71 indexed citations

16.

Goh, Debbie. (2008). It's the Gays' Fault. Journal of Communication Inquiry. 32(4). 383–399. 22 indexed citations

17.

Goh, Debbie, Christine Ogan, Manju Ahuja, Susan C. Herring, & Jean C. Robinson. (2007). Being the Same Isn't Enough: Impact of Male and Female Mentors on Computer Self-Efficacy of College Students in It-Related Fields. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 37(1). 19–40. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact