Natalie A. Roe
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering
- Astronomy and Astrophysics
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Armin KarcherWilliam F. KolbeS. HollandC. BebekD. E. GroomMaximilian FabriciusA. S. JohnsonD. L. Burke
- Topics
- CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (14 papers)Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (8 papers)Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersNuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated EquipmentIEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceJapan
In The Last Decade
Natalie A. Roe
20 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 136
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 121
- Aerospace Engineering 76
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 44
- Instrumentation 28
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie A. Roe
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie A. Roe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie A. Roe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie A. Roe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie A. Roe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie A. Roe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie A. Roe. The network helps show where Natalie A. Roe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie A. Roe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie A. Roe. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie A. Roe based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie A. Roe. Natalie A. Roe is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 17 | |
| 10 | Quantum efficiency characterization of back-illuminated CCDs Part 2: reflectivity measurements | 3 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Natalie A. Roe
Natalie A. Roe is a scholar working on Instrumentation, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 20 papers that have together received 243 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (14 papers), Infrared Target Detection Methodologies (8 papers) and Particle Detector Development and Performance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (136 citations), Instrumentation (28 citations) and Aerospace Engineering (76 citations). Natalie A. Roe has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Armin Karcher, William F. Kolbe, S. Holland, C. Bebek, D. E. Groom, Maximilian Fabricius, A. S. Johnson, D. L. Burke, P. H. Garbincius and R. J. Wilson. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment and IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.