This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sholl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sholl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sholl more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sholl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sholl. The network helps show where Michael Sholl may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Sholl
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Sholl.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Sholl based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Sholl. Michael Sholl is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Doel, Peter, Michael Sholl, Ming Liang, et al.. (2014). The DESI wide field corrector optics. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 9147. 91476R–91476R.13 indexed citations
Besuner, Robert, C. Bebek, Arjun Dey, et al.. (2012). Integrating BigBOSS with the Mayall Telescope. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8446. 844652–844652.1 indexed citations
4.
Sholl, Michael, C. Bebek, Robert Besuner, et al.. (2012). BigBOSS: a stage IV dark energy redshift survey. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8446. 844667–844667.6 indexed citations
5.
Mostek, N., K. Barbary, C. Bebek, et al.. (2012). Mapping the universe with BigBOSS. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8446. 84460Q–84460Q.3 indexed citations
6.
Jelinsky, Patrick, C. Bebek, Robert Besuner, et al.. (2012). The BigBOSS spectrograph. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 8446. 844668–844668.3 indexed citations
7.
Sholl, Michael, M. Lampton, & M. E. Levi. (2011). A Practical Implementation of the Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope WFIRST. AAS. 217.1 indexed citations
Content, David A., et al.. (2010). Joint Dark Energy Mission optical design studies. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7731. 77311D–77311D.5 indexed citations
Sholl, Michael, et al.. (2008). Three mirror anastigmat survey telescope optimization. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7010. 70103M–70103M.2 indexed citations
Taylor, Ellen, et al.. (2003). CHIPS: A NASA University Explorer Astronomy Mission. Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University).4 indexed citations
18.
Sirk, Martin M., Geoffrey A. Gaines, Ellen Taylor, et al.. (2003). Performance of the Cosmic Hot Interstellar Plasma Spectrometer. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 5164. 54–54.5 indexed citations
Hurwitz, Mark & Michael Sholl. (1999). The CHIPS University-Class Explorer. AAS. 195.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.