D. E. Groom

69.8k total citations
51 papers, 954 citations indexed

About

D. E. Groom is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, D. E. Groom has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 954 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 23 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and 13 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in D. E. Groom's work include CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (21 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (13 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (9 papers). D. E. Groom is often cited by papers focused on CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors (21 papers), Particle Detector Development and Performance (13 papers) and Radiation Detection and Scintillator Technologies (9 papers). D. E. Groom collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Italy. D. E. Groom's co-authors include N. Mokhov, S. Striganov, S. R. Klein, S. Holland, John Marshall, David J. Cutler, R. J. Stover, Mingzhi Wei, N. Palaio and Armin Karcher and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

D. E. Groom

48 papers receiving 903 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. E. Groom United States 17 606 250 199 132 122 51 954
T. Iguchi Japan 14 212 0.3× 124 0.5× 352 1.8× 126 1.0× 165 1.4× 74 737
G. Barbiellini Italy 19 794 1.3× 135 0.5× 316 1.6× 137 1.0× 46 0.4× 85 1.1k
W. Hajdas Switzerland 22 478 0.8× 374 1.5× 335 1.7× 571 4.3× 92 0.8× 91 1.4k
S. Bell United Kingdom 11 337 0.6× 145 0.6× 132 0.7× 856 6.5× 77 0.6× 26 1.2k
M. J. Eckart United States 14 593 1.0× 349 1.4× 402 2.0× 57 0.4× 63 0.5× 59 1.4k
Mark W. Bautz United States 15 435 0.7× 193 0.8× 147 0.7× 961 7.3× 106 0.9× 65 1.2k
A. Huber United States 15 195 0.3× 236 0.9× 400 2.0× 180 1.4× 77 0.6× 39 784
P. Picchi Italy 17 828 1.4× 181 0.7× 341 1.7× 68 0.5× 35 0.3× 104 995
T. Sloan United Kingdom 21 769 1.3× 335 1.3× 132 0.7× 310 2.3× 15 0.1× 81 1.3k
R. H. Milburn United States 13 634 1.0× 104 0.4× 236 1.2× 29 0.2× 47 0.4× 36 871

Countries citing papers authored by D. E. Groom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. E. Groom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. E. Groom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. E. Groom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. E. Groom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. E. Groom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. E. Groom. The network helps show where D. E. Groom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. E. Groom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. E. Groom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. E. Groom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. E. Groom. D. E. Groom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bebek, C., J. Emes, D. E. Groom, et al.. (2017). Status of the CCD development for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument. Journal of Instrumentation. 12(4). C04018–C04018. 13 indexed citations
2.
Groom, D. E.. (2012). Degradation of resolution in a homogeneous dual-readout hadronic calorimeter. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 705. 24–31. 3 indexed citations
3.
Groom, D. E.. (2012). Simplification of the DREAM collaboration's “Q/S method” in dual readout calorimetry analysis. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 697. 84–86. 2 indexed citations
4.
Groom, D. E.. (2007). A simplistic view of hadron calorimetry. AIP conference proceedings. 896. 137–149.
5.
Holland, S., C. Bebek, P. Daniels, et al.. (2007). Technology development for 4k × 4k, back- illuminated, fully depleted scientific CCD imagers. 433. 2220–2225. 2 indexed citations
6.
Fabricius, Maximilian, C. Bebek, D. E. Groom, Armin Karcher, & Natalie A. Roe. (2006). Quantum efficiency characterization of back-illuminated CCDs Part 2: reflectivity measurements. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3 indexed citations
7.
Roe, Natalie A., C. Bebek, Kyle Dawson, et al.. (2006). Radiation-tolerant, red-sensitive CCDs for dark energy investigations. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 572(1). 526–527. 2 indexed citations
8.
Groom, D. E.. (2004). Cosmic Rays and Other Nonsense in Astronomical CCD Imagers. 300. 81–93. 2 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Alan Р., R. J. McDonald, Donna C. Hurley, et al.. (2002). <title>Radiation events in astronomical CCD images</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4669. 172–183. 17 indexed citations
10.
Smith, A. R., R. J. McDonald, S. Holland, et al.. (2001). Radiation events in astronomical CCD images. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 3 indexed citations
11.
Groom, D. E., S. Holland, M. E. Levi, et al.. (2000). Back-illuminated, fully-depleted CCD image sensors for use in optical and near-IR astronomy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 442(1-3). 216–222. 16 indexed citations
12.
Groom, D. E.. (2000). Searches for massive neutrinos. The European Physical Journal C. 15(1-4). 358–359. 4 indexed citations
13.
Groom, D. E.. (2000). Recent progress on CCDs for astronomical imaging. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 4008. 634–634. 19 indexed citations
14.
Groom, D. E., S. Holland, M. E. Levi, et al.. (1999). <title>Quantum efficiency of a back-illuminated CCD imager: an optical approach</title>. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 3649. 80–90. 28 indexed citations
15.
Cutler, David J., et al.. (1981). Measurement of the cosmic-ray sidereal anisotropy near 1500 GV. The Astrophysical Journal. 248. 1166–1166. 18 indexed citations
16.
Badtke, D. H., B. A. Barnett, G. T. Zorn, et al.. (1978). Inclusive Muon Production ine+eAnnihilation withs12=7.3GeV. Physical Review Letters. 40(13). 827–830. 1 indexed citations
17.
Groom, D. E., et al.. (1973). Implications of Scaling for the Median Primary Energy in Anisotropy Experiments. ICRC. 2. 851. 1 indexed citations
18.
Groom, D. E., et al.. (1970). The Reactionπpnπ0in the Backward Hemisphere at 6 GeV/c. Physical Review Letters. 24(17). 964–967. 37 indexed citations
19.
Groom, D. E. & John Marshall. (1967). ΛPolarization at 90° inK+ΛPhotoproduction. Physical Review. 159(5). 1213–1219. 22 indexed citations
20.
Groom, D. E. & John Marshall. (1962). A 25-Input Pulse-Height Recording System. Review of Scientific Instruments. 33(11). 1249–1255. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026