Stephen M. Feeney
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 10%
- Instrumentation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Hiranya V. PeirisD. MortlockJustin AlsingB. D. WandeltTom CharnockS. NissankeMatthew C. JohnsonA. R. Williamson
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (19 papers)Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers)
- Journals
- Physical Review LettersThe Astrophysical JournalMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
Stephen M. Feeney
28 papers receiving 821 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 737
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 289
- Artificial Intelligence 100
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 64
- Instrumentation 59
Countries citing papers authored by Stephen M. Feeney
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen M. Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen M. Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen M. Feeney more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen M. Feeney
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen M. Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen M. Feeney. The network helps show where Stephen M. Feeney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen M. Feeney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen M. Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen M. Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen M. Feeney. Stephen M. Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 19 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 125 | |
| 6 | 130 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 96 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | The importance of local measurements for cosmology | 6 |
| 12 | 89 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 16 | |
| 17 | 40 | |
| 18 | 38 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Stephen M. Feeney
Stephen M. Feeney is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistics and Probability, having authored 30 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (19 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (11 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (737 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (289 citations) and Instrumentation (59 citations). Stephen M. Feeney has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Hiranya V. Peiris, D. Mortlock, Justin Alsing, B. D. Wandelt, Tom Charnock, S. Nissanke, Matthew C. Johnson, A. R. Williamson, Andrew Pontzen and D. Scolnic. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, The Astrophysical Journal and Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.