Emily Sargent

494 total citations
8 papers, 343 citations indexed

About

Emily Sargent is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Sargent has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 343 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Epidemiology, 6 papers in Applied Psychology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Emily Sargent's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Emily Sargent is often cited by papers focused on Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (6 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Emily Sargent collaborates with scholars based in United States and Egypt. Emily Sargent's co-authors include Robert D. Dvorak, Brittany L. Stevenson, Nicholas J. Kuvaas, Tess M. Kilwein, Thomas J. Williams, Matthew R. Pearson, Matthew P. Kramer, Dorian A. Lamis, Michael E. Dunn and Tyler B. Wray and has published in prestigious journals such as Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Addictive Behaviors and Psychology of Addictive Behaviors.

In The Last Decade

Emily Sargent

8 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Emily Sargent United States	8	162	139	112	107	62	8	343
Nicholas J. Kuvaas United States	10	202 1.2×	114 0.8×	82 0.7×	75 0.7×	70 1.1×	10	358
Renee M. Cloutier United States	11	154 1.0×	105 0.8×	78 0.7×	46 0.4×	44 0.7×	46	320
Natalia Van Doren United States	8	100 0.6×	96 0.7×	99 0.9×	49 0.5×	53 0.9×	31	294
Dorian Hunter‐Reel United States	9	100 0.6×	162 1.2×	64 0.6×	136 1.3×	46 0.7×	10	370
Meredith A. Terlecki United States	13	178 1.1×	229 1.6×	164 1.5×	127 1.2×	34 0.5×	16	396
Alexandra MacLean United States	8	220 1.4×	189 1.4×	63 0.6×	118 1.1×	45 0.7×	13	365
Sarah Barton Samoluk Canada	11	309 1.9×	215 1.5×	212 1.9×	144 1.3×	45 0.7×	11	520
Elizabeth M. Lewis United States	13	163 1.0×	74 0.5×	102 0.9×	39 0.4×	44 0.7×	26	318
David E. Eakin United States	7	211 1.3×	171 1.2×	35 0.3×	105 1.0×	33 0.5×	9	382
Sonia M. Shah United States	9	192 1.2×	65 0.5×	123 1.1×	47 0.4×	42 0.7×	10	291

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Sargent

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Sargent's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Sargent with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Sargent more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Sargent

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Sargent. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Sargent. The network helps show where Emily Sargent may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Sargent

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Sargent. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Sargent based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Sargent. Emily Sargent is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Sargent, Emily, Tess M. Kilwein, Robert D. Dvorak, et al.. (2018). Deviance regulation theory and drinking outcomes among Greek-life students during spring break.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 26(4). 366–376. 10 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., et al.. (2018). Using deviance regulation theory to target marijuana use intentions among college students.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 26(1). 29–35. 10 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., Brittany L. Stevenson, Tess M. Kilwein, et al.. (2018). Tension reduction and affect regulation: An examination of mood indices on drinking and non-drinking days among university student drinkers.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 26(4). 377–390. 37 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., Matthew P. Kramer, Brittany L. Stevenson, Emily Sargent, & Tess M. Kilwein. (2017). An application of deviance regulation theory to reduce alcohol-related problems among college women during spring break.. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 31(3). 295–306. 13 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., et al.. (2016). Daily associations between emotional functioning and alcohol involvement: Moderating effects of response inhibition and gender. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 163. S46–S53. 42 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., Nicholas J. Kuvaas, Tess M. Kilwein, et al.. (2015). Are drinking motives associated with sexual “hookups” among college student drinkers?. Journal of American College Health. 64(2). 133–138. 15 indexed citations

Dvorak, Robert D., Emily Sargent, Tess M. Kilwein, et al.. (2014). Alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences: associations with emotion regulation difficulties. The American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 40(2). 125–130. 168 indexed citations

Kuvaas, Nicholas J., Robert D. Dvorak, Matthew R. Pearson, Dorian A. Lamis, & Emily Sargent. (2013). Self-regulation and alcohol use involvement: A latent class analysis. Addictive Behaviors. 39(1). 146–152. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact