Joshua Curtiss
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stefan G. HofmannDavid H. KlemanskiJoseph K. CarpenterRichard J. McNallySteven C. HayesAlethea DesrosiersVera VineShelley Kind
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (28 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (27 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (23 papers)
- Journals
- New England Journal of MedicineSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaClinical Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyJapan
In The Last Decade
Joshua Curtiss
54 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 133
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.2k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 450
- Social Psychology 422
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 287
Countries citing papers authored by Joshua Curtiss
This map shows the geographic impact of Joshua Curtiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joshua Curtiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joshua Curtiss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Joshua Curtiss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joshua Curtiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joshua Curtiss. The network helps show where Joshua Curtiss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Joshua Curtiss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Joshua Curtiss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Joshua Curtiss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Joshua Curtiss. Joshua Curtiss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 31 | |
| 15 | The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapybreakdown → | 183 |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | 43 | |
| 18 | 234 | |
| 19 | 109 | |
| 20 | 38 |
About Joshua Curtiss
Joshua Curtiss is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Biological Psychiatry and Applied Psychology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (28 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (27 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations) and Applied Psychology (268 citations). Joshua Curtiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Stefan G. Hofmann, David H. Klemanski, Joseph K. Carpenter, Richard J. McNally, Steven C. Hayes, Alethea Desrosiers, Vera Vine, Shelley Kind, Leigh A. Andrews and Susan Nolen–Hoeksema. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.