Natalia Quintas‐Froufe

455 citations
45 papers · 310 indexed · h-index 10

Natalia Quintas‐Froufe

39 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Natalia Quintas‐Froufe
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Communication 227
  • Computer Networks and Communications 179
  • Gender Studies 48
  • Linguistics and Language 16
  • Museology 12
Replace Ana González-Neira with:
Ana González-Neira Spain
Mar Guerrero-Pico Spain
Antonio Pineda Spain
Graciela Padilla Castillo Spain
Tatiana Hidalgo‐Marí Spain
Manuel Montes Vozmediano Spain
Roberto Aparici Spain
Salomé Berrocal Gonzálo Spain
María del Carmen García Galera Spain
Beatriz Catalina-García Spain
Natalia Quintas‐Froufe relative to Ana González-Neira Spain Ana González-Neira's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Ana González-Neira · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Quintas‐Froufe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Quintas‐Froufe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Quintas‐Froufe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Quintas‐Froufe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Quintas‐Froufe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Quintas‐Froufe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Quintas‐Froufe. The network helps show where Natalia Quintas‐Froufe may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Quintas‐Froufe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Quintas‐Froufe Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Quintas‐Froufe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20230
3 20234
4 202110
5 20217
6 20201
7 20206
8 20184
9
La emergencia de las redes sociales académicas: su impacto académico
20161
10 20152
11 201510
12
Del apagón analógico al temático: El comportamiento de la audiencia televisiva española
20141
13 20146
14 201424
15
Tabvertising : formatos y estrategias publicitarias en tabletas
20134
16 20131
17 20102
18 20101
19
La Xunta de Galicia como anunciante
20104
20 20082

About Natalia Quintas‐Froufe

Natalia Quintas‐Froufe is a scholar working on Communication, Computer Networks and Communications and History, having authored 45 papers that have together received 310 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media and Digital Communication (33 papers), Advertising and Communication Studies (17 papers), Communication and COVID-19 Impact (13 papers), Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media (9 papers), Media, Journalism, and Communication History (9 papers), Journalism and Media Studies (8 papers), Psychology Research and Bibliometrics (3 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (227 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (179 citations) and Gender Studies (48 citations). Natalia Quintas‐Froufe has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Italy and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Ana González-Neira, Jorge Vázquez-Herrero, Carlos Múñiz, Daniel Halpern, José Rúas Araújo, Sandra Sandra, Antonio Antonio, Natália Natália, Félix Zurita Ortega and Carmen Marta Lazo. Their work appears in journals such as El Profesional de la Informacion, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación, Revista Latina de Comunicación Social and Journal of Design History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026