Natalia Acosta‐Baena

3.0k citations
36 papers · 736 indexed · h-index 9

Natalia Acosta‐Baena

30 papers receiving 725 citations

Peers

Natalia Acosta‐Baena
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Sensory Systems 243
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 210
  • Physiology 339
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 142
  • Biochemistry 41
Replace Nicholas Olney with:
Nicholas Olney United States
Gricelda Hernandez United States
Dawn Zhu United States
David André Barrière France
Richard Lennertz United States
Jennifer Tremblay‐Mercier Canada
Cindy Barbosa United States
Elfrida R. Grant United States
Judit Boczán Hungary
Natalia Acosta‐Baena relative to Nicholas Olney United States Nicholas Olney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Nicholas Olney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Natalia Acosta‐Baena

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalia Acosta‐Baena's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalia Acosta‐Baena with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalia Acosta‐Baena more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalia Acosta‐Baena

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalia Acosta‐Baena. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalia Acosta‐Baena. The network helps show where Natalia Acosta‐Baena may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Natalia Acosta‐Baena, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Natalia Acosta‐Baena Line = papers co-authored together Natalia Acosta‐Baena links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20246
3 20240
4 20240
5 20240
6 20231
7 20227
8 20227
9 202213
10 20212
11 20184
12 20181
13 20164
14 20164
15 20153
16 201463
17
Calidad de vida laboral y liderazgo en trabajadores asistenciales y administrativos en un centro oncológico de Bogotá (Colombia)
20138
18 201229
19 2010333
20
Emil Theodor Kocher: An innovator surgeon
20091

About Natalia Acosta‐Baena

Natalia Acosta‐Baena is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Physiology and Sensory Systems, having authored 36 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (11 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (8 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (4 papers), Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (4 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (3 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (2 papers), Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery (2 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (243 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (210 citations) and Physiology (339 citations). Natalia Acosta‐Baena has collaborated with scholars based in Colombia, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Francisco Lopera, Sonia Moreno, Daniel Camilo Aguirre–Acevedo, Diego Sepúlveda‐Falla, Nicolás Pineda-Trujillo, John N. Wood, Bárbara Kremeyer, Mari‐Wyn Burley, Andrés Ruiz‐Linares and Florence R. Fricker. Their work appears in journals such as Alzheimer s & Dementia, Journal of Alzheimer s Disease, Scientific Reports, JAMA Network Open and Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026