Natacha Borgers

12 total papers · 1.1k total citations
9 papers, 709 citations indexed

About

Natacha Borgers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Natacha Borgers has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 709 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Statistics and Probability and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Natacha Borgers's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). Natacha Borgers is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (2 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers). Natacha Borgers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Japan. Natacha Borgers's co-authors include Joop J. Hox, Edith D. de Leeuw, Dirk Sikkel, Jaap Dronkers, Bernard M. S. van Praag, Frederike Jörg and A.J.P. Schrijvers and has published in prestigious journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, International Journal for Quality in Health Care and Journal of Aging and Health.

In The Last Decade

Natacha Borgers

9 papers receiving 643 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Natacha Borgers 216 199 122 108 71 9 709
Lynn N. Tabata 147 0.7× 211 1.1× 144 1.2× 185 1.7× 92 1.3× 7 910
Elizabeth Mortenson 315 1.5× 226 1.1× 252 2.1× 174 1.6× 107 1.5× 7 830
Sarah R. Crissey 322 1.5× 142 0.7× 201 1.6× 148 1.4× 27 0.4× 10 842
Asa-Sophia Maglio 178 0.8× 157 0.8× 158 1.3× 140 1.3× 60 0.8× 7 812
Marian B. Wolf 106 0.5× 313 1.6× 152 1.2× 72 0.7× 102 1.4× 6 703
Andrew G D Holmes 224 1.0× 212 1.1× 89 0.7× 89 0.8× 37 0.5× 13 735
M.W. van Eijck 131 0.6× 201 1.0× 102 0.8× 70 0.6× 74 1.0× 12 663
Diane E. Papalia 182 0.8× 372 1.9× 96 0.8× 129 1.2× 167 2.4× 21 910
Sue L. Motulsky 205 0.9× 123 0.6× 223 1.8× 217 2.0× 79 1.1× 6 739
Bengt‐Erik Andersson 152 0.7× 352 1.8× 78 0.6× 227 2.1× 67 0.9× 13 664

Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Borgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Borgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Borgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Borgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Borgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Borgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Borgers. The network helps show where Natacha Borgers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natacha Borgers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natacha Borgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natacha Borgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natacha Borgers. Natacha Borgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026