Natacha Borgers

1.1k total citations
9 papers, 717 citations indexed

About

Natacha Borgers is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Natacha Borgers has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 717 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 4 papers in Statistics and Probability and 2 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Natacha Borgers's work include Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (2 papers). Natacha Borgers is often cited by papers focused on Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (4 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (2 papers) and Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques (2 papers). Natacha Borgers collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Japan and United States. Natacha Borgers's co-authors include Joop J. Hox, Edith D. de Leeuw, Dirk Sikkel, Jaap Dronkers, Bernard M. S. van Praag, Frederike Jörg and A.J.P. Schrijvers and has published in prestigious journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, International Journal for Quality in Health Care and Journal of Aging and Health.

In The Last Decade

Natacha Borgers

9 papers receiving 651 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natacha Borgers Netherlands 6 219 200 124 109 71 9 717
M. E. Betsy Garrison United States 11 128 0.6× 201 1.0× 119 1.0× 99 0.9× 81 1.1× 40 618
Lynn N. Tabata United States 5 147 0.7× 211 1.1× 143 1.2× 185 1.7× 92 1.3× 7 913
Patricia A. Aloise‐Young United States 16 199 0.9× 111 0.6× 189 1.5× 165 1.5× 98 1.4× 33 914
Daniel Anderson United States 9 127 0.6× 156 0.8× 115 0.9× 196 1.8× 95 1.3× 37 621
Judith A. Nelson United States 14 146 0.7× 197 1.0× 203 1.6× 187 1.7× 58 0.8× 43 748
Michele F. Zimowski United States 6 142 0.6× 203 1.0× 155 1.3× 204 1.9× 114 1.6× 14 996
Joan Abbott‐Chapman Australia 14 246 1.1× 312 1.6× 91 0.7× 84 0.8× 23 0.3× 40 692
Catrine Kostenius Sweden 16 190 0.9× 236 1.2× 110 0.9× 130 1.2× 76 1.1× 61 744
Artur Pokropek Poland 17 197 0.9× 288 1.4× 105 0.8× 82 0.8× 63 0.9× 58 860
Chih-Chien Yang Taiwan 7 94 0.4× 106 0.5× 134 1.1× 160 1.5× 41 0.6× 19 679

Countries citing papers authored by Natacha Borgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natacha Borgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natacha Borgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natacha Borgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natacha Borgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natacha Borgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natacha Borgers. The network helps show where Natacha Borgers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natacha Borgers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natacha Borgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natacha Borgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natacha Borgers. Natacha Borgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Borgers, Natacha, et al.. (2006). SOTS: a system for online testing of skills. 2 indexed citations
2.
Jörg, Frederike, Natacha Borgers, A.J.P. Schrijvers, & Joop J. Hox. (2006). Variation in Long-Term Care Needs Assessors’ Willingness to Support Clients’ Requests for Admission to a Residential Home. Journal of Aging and Health. 18(6). 767–790. 5 indexed citations
3.
Borgers, Natacha, Dirk Sikkel, & Joop J. Hox. (2004). Response Effects in Surveys on Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Number of Response Options, Negative Wording, and Neutral Mid-Point. Quality & Quantity. 38(1). 17–33. 188 indexed citations
4.
Jörg, Frederike, Natacha Borgers, & A.J.P. Schrijvers. (2003). Client, needs assessor and agency-related factors predicting allocation of electric scooters to community-dwelling elderly in The Netherlands: a vignette study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 25(14). 761–770. 7 indexed citations
5.
Borgers, Natacha. (2003). Response Quality in Survey Research with Children and Adolescents: The Effect of Labeled Response Options and Vague Quantifiers. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 15(1). 83–94. 78 indexed citations
6.
Hox, Joop J. & Natacha Borgers. (2001). Item Nonresponse in Questionnaire Research with Children. Journal of Official Statistics. 17(2). 321–335. 62 indexed citations
7.
Hox, Joop J., et al.. (2001). Testing measurement and structural equivalence in different age groups of children. Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University). 67(67). 65–80. 3 indexed citations
8.
Borgers, Natacha, Edith D. de Leeuw, & Joop J. Hox. (2000). Children as Respondents in Survey Research: Cognitive Development and Response Quality 1. Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique. 66(1). 60–75. 356 indexed citations
9.
Borgers, Natacha, Jaap Dronkers, & Bernard M. S. van Praag. (1996). The effects of different forms of two- and single-parent families on the well-being of their children in Dutch secondary education. Social Psychology of Education. 1(2). 147–169. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. E. Betsy Garrison Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Lynn N. Tabata Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Patricia A. Aloise‐Young Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Anderson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Judith A. Nelson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michele F. Zimowski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joan Abbott‐Chapman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Catrine Kostenius Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Artur Pokropek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Chih-Chien Yang
Rankless by CCL
2026