Naomi Cocks

1.4k total citations
50 papers, 922 citations indexed

About

Naomi Cocks is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Naomi Cocks has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 922 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 16 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 11 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Naomi Cocks's work include Hearing Impairment and Communication (15 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (11 papers). Naomi Cocks is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Impairment and Communication (15 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (11 papers) and Dysphagia Assessment and Management (11 papers). Naomi Cocks collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and United States. Naomi Cocks's co-authors include Lucy Dipper, Madeleine Pritchard, Gary Morgan, Katerina Hilari, Jane Marshall, Tim Pring, Jade Cartwright, Sarah Wilkes‐Gillan, Emilia Michou and Reinie Cordier and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Advanced Nursing and Psychology and Aging.

In The Last Decade

Naomi Cocks

49 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Naomi Cocks
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 431
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 384
  • Speech and Hearing 154
  • Human-Computer Interaction 154
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 151
Replace Lucy Bryant with:
Lucy Bryant Australia
Steven Bloch United Kingdom
Kerttu Huttunen Finland
Diane L. Kendall United States
Paul Conroy United Kingdom
Helen Kelly Ireland
Cláudia Regina Furquim de Andrade Brazil
Dennis M. Ruscello United States
Karen Hux United States
Greg Leigh Australia
Lucy Bryant Australia View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Naomi Cocks
Naomi Cocks · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Naomi Cocks
Naomi Cocks · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Naomi Cocks

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Naomi Cocks's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Naomi Cocks with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Naomi Cocks more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Naomi Cocks

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Naomi Cocks. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Naomi Cocks. The network helps show where Naomi Cocks may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Naomi Cocks

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Naomi Cocks. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Naomi Cocks based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Naomi Cocks. Naomi Cocks is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 9
2 9
3 2
4 7
5 15
6 17
7 36
8
Being prepared for working in palliative care: The speech pathology perspective
4
9 10
10 25
11 38
12 3
13 11
14 5
15 16
16
Functional reading therapy for individuals with acquired reading difficulties
5
17 31
18 6
19 25
20 4

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026