Nancy Zebell
Impact in
- Safety Research top 2%
- Child Welfare and Adoption
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Child Abuse and Trauma
- Family and Disability Support Research
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 7
- Child Abuse and Trauma 5
- Family and Disability Support Research 3
- Child Therapy and Development 2
- Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics 1
-
- Child Welfare and Adoption 4
- Co-authors
- Anthony J. Urquiza (8 shared papers)Susan G. Timmer (8 shared papers)Lisa M. Ware (1 shared paper)Amy D. Herschell (2 shared papers)Joaquín Borrego (1 shared paper)Cheryl B. McNeil (1 shared paper)Stefan C. Dombrowski (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Violence and Victims (1 paper)Child Abuse & Neglect (1 paper)Child Maltreatment (1 paper)Research on Social Work Practice (1 paper)Children and Youth Services Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Nancy Zebell
8 papers receiving 400 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Safety Research 188
- Clinical Psychology 411
- Social Psychology 78
- Health 32
- General Health Professions 56
Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Zebell
This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Zebell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Zebell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Zebell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Zebell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Zebell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Zebell. The network helps show where Nancy Zebell may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Nancy Zebell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2005 | 123 | |
| 2 | 2005 | 84 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 54 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 5 | Parent-child interaction therapy: application of an empirically supported treatment to maltreated children in foster care. | 2007 | 42 |
| 6 | 2008 | 39 | |
| 7 | 1999 | 39 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 1 |
About Nancy Zebell
Nancy Zebell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Social Psychology, Health and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 445 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (3 papers), Child Therapy and Development (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (1 paper) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (188 citations), Clinical Psychology (411 citations), Social Psychology (78 citations), Health (32 citations) and General Health Professions (56 citations). Nancy Zebell has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Anthony J. Urquiza, Susan G. Timmer, Lisa M. Ware, Amy D. Herschell, Joaquín Borrego, Cheryl B. McNeil and Stefan C. Dombrowski. Their work appears in journals such as Violence and Victims, Child Abuse & Neglect, Child Maltreatment, Research on Social Work Practice and Children and Youth Services Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.