Nancy Zebell

691 total citations
9 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Nancy Zebell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Nancy Zebell has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Clinical Psychology, 4 papers in Safety Research and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Nancy Zebell's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers). Nancy Zebell is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (7 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (5 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers). Nancy Zebell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Nancy Zebell's co-authors include Anthony J. Urquiza, Susan G. Timmer, Lisa M. Ware, Amy D. Herschell, Joaquín Borrego, Cheryl B. McNeil and Stefan C. Dombrowski and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Children and Youth Services Review and Violence and Victims.

In The Last Decade

Nancy Zebell

8 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nancy Zebell United States	8	411	188	78	56	42	9	445
Peter F. Toscano United States	7	262 0.6×	123 0.7×	60 0.8×	80 1.4×	45 1.1×	7	339
Karyn B. Purvis United States	13	340 0.8×	200 1.1×	66 0.8×	85 1.5×	58 1.4×	30	451
Molly A. Brunk United States	5	402 1.0×	141 0.8×	85 1.1×	78 1.4×	58 1.4×	8	445
Tormod Rimehaug Norway	9	233 0.6×	151 0.8×	50 0.6×	96 1.7×	91 2.2×	30	376
George A. Fouras	2	417 1.0×	118 0.6×	113 1.4×	101 1.8×	67 1.6×	2	490
Tasha R. Howe United States	10	390 0.9×	106 0.6×	52 0.7×	68 1.2×	70 1.7×	19	465
Mira Vasileva Germany	9	296 0.7×	82 0.4×	40 0.5×	41 0.7×	56 1.3×	25	365
Kami L. Gallus United States	12	230 0.6×	54 0.3×	62 0.8×	56 1.0×	55 1.3×	32	329
Vivien Prior United Kingdom	9	250 0.6×	95 0.5×	95 1.2×	28 0.5×	74 1.8×	14	336
Donatella Cavanna Italy	12	306 0.7×	88 0.5×	151 1.9×	31 0.6×	92 2.2×	43	411

Countries citing papers authored by Nancy Zebell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nancy Zebell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nancy Zebell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nancy Zebell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nancy Zebell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nancy Zebell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nancy Zebell. The network helps show where Nancy Zebell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nancy Zebell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nancy Zebell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nancy Zebell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nancy Zebell. Nancy Zebell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Timmer, Susan G., et al.. (2011). The Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy with Depressive Mothers: The Changing Relationship as the Agent of Individual Change. Child Psychiatry & Human Development. 42(4). 406–423. 42 indexed citations

2.

Timmer, Susan G., Lisa M. Ware, Anthony J. Urquiza, & Nancy Zebell. (2010). The Effectiveness of Parent–Child Interaction Therapy for Victims of Interparental Violence. Violence and Victims. 25(4). 486–503. 54 indexed citations

3.

Timmer, Susan G., et al.. (2009). Efficacy of Adjunct In-Home Coaching to Improve Outcomes in Parent—Child Interaction Therapy. Research on Social Work Practice. 20(1). 36–45. 21 indexed citations

4.

Dombrowski, Stefan C., Susan G. Timmer, & Nancy Zebell. (2008). Parent-Child Attunement Therapy for Toddlers: A Behaviorally Oriented, Play-Based Parent Training Model. 125–156. 1 indexed citations

5.

Herschell, Amy D., et al.. (2008). Evaluation of a Treatment Manual and Workshops for Disseminating, Parent–Child Interaction Therapy. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 36(1). 63–81. 39 indexed citations

6.

Timmer, Susan G., et al.. (2007). Parent-child interaction therapy: application of an empirically supported treatment to maltreated children in foster care.. PubMed. 85(6). 919–39. 42 indexed citations

7.

Timmer, Susan G., et al.. (2005). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy: Application to maltreating parent-child dyads. Child Abuse & Neglect. 29(7). 825–842. 123 indexed citations

8.

Timmer, Susan G., Anthony J. Urquiza, & Nancy Zebell. (2005). Challenging foster caregiver–maltreated child relationships: The effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy. Children and Youth Services Review. 28(1). 1–19. 84 indexed citations

9.

Borrego, Joaquín, et al.. (1999). Parent-Child Interaction Therapy with a Family at High Risk for Physical Abuse. Child Maltreatment. 4(4). 331–342. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact