Child Maltreatment

1.1k papers and 41.4k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in Child Maltreatment in the last decades have received a total of 41.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Child Maltreatment usually cover Clinical Psychology (984 papers), Safety Research (301 papers) and General Health Professions (275 papers) specifically the topics of Child Abuse and Trauma (906 papers), Child Welfare and Adoption (293 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (240 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Child Maltreatment are Brett Drake, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Michael D. De Bellis, Richard Ormrod, Heather A. Turner, Eveline M. Euser, Esther Deblinger, Catalina M. Arata and David Finkelhor.

In The Last Decade

Child Maltreatment

1.0k papers receiving 39.0k citations

Fields of papers published in Child Maltreatment

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Child Maltreatment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Child Maltreatment.

Countries where authors publish in Child Maltreatment

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Child Maltreatment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Child Maltreatment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Child Maltreatment more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026