Physiologia Plantarum

15.7k papers and 489.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 15.7k papers published in Physiologia Plantarum in the last decades have received a total of 489.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Physiologia Plantarum usually cover Plant Science (12.1k papers), Molecular Biology (6.6k papers) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.6k papers) specifically the topics of Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance (3.2k papers), Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (2.5k papers) and Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2.2k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Physiologia Plantarum are Folke Skoog, Toshio Murashige, Torsten Ingestad, Timothy J. Close, Ola M. Heide, Christine H. Foyer, İsmail Çakmak, Kozi Asada, Hans Lambers and Ron Mittler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Physiologia Plantarum

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Physiologia Plantarum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Physiologia Plantarum.

Countries where authors publish in Physiologia Plantarum

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Physiologia Plantarum. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Physiologia Plantarum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Physiologia Plantarum more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025